Télécharger le texte intégral - ISPED-Enseignement à distance

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Annexes 216References[1] Amieva H, Jacqmin-Gadda H, Orgogozo JM, Le Carret N, Helmer C, Letenneur L,Barberger-Gateau P, Fabrigoule C,Dartigues JF. The 9 year cognitive decline before dementiaof the Alzheimer type: a prospective population-based study. Brain 2005;128(Pt 5):1093-101[2] Benton A.Manuel pour l'application du Test de Rétention Visuelle. Applications cliniqueset expérimentales. Paris:Centre de Psychologie appliquée; 1965[3] Collaer ML,Hines M. Human behavioral sex differences: a role for gonadal hormonesduring early development? Psychol Bull 1995;118(1):55-107[4] Elias MF, Elias PK, D'Agostino RB, Silbershatz H,Wolf PA. Role of age, education, andgender on cognitive performance in the Framingham Heart Study: community-based norms.Exp Aging Res 1997;23(3):201-35[5] Folstein MF, Folstein SE,McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state". A practical method forgrading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975;12(3):189-98[6] Fratiglioni L, Launer LJ, Andersen K, Breteler MM, Copeland JR, Dartigues JF, Lobo A,Martinez-Lage J, Soininen H,Hofman A. Incidence of dementia and major subtypes inEurope: A collaborative study of population-based cohorts. Neurologic Diseases in theElderly Research Group. Neurology 2000;54(11 Suppl 5):S10-5[7] Ganguli M, Ratcliff G, Huff FJ, Belle S, Kancel MJ, Fischer L, Seaberg EC,Kuller LH.Effects of age, gender, and education on cognitive tests in a rural elderly community sample:norms from the Monongahela Valley Independent Elders Survey. Neuroepidemiology1991;10(1):42-52[8] Ganguli M, Seaberg EC, Ratcliff GG, Belle SH,DeKosky ST. Cognitive stability over 2years in a rural elderly population: the MoVIES project. Neuroepidemiology 1996;15(1):42-5018
Annexes 217[9] Hall CB, Lipton RB, Sliwinski M,Stewart WF. A change point model for estimating theonset of cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer's disease. Stat Med 2000;19(11-12):1555-66[10] Isaacs B,Kennie AT. The Set test as an aid to the detection of dementia in old people. BrJ Psychiatry 1973;123(575):467-70[11] Jacqmin-Gadda H, Commenges D,Dartigues JF. Random change point model for jointmodeling of cognitive decline and dementia. Biometrics 2006;62(1):254-60[12] Jacqmin-Gadda H, Fabrigoule C, Commenges D,Dartigues JF. A 5-year longitudinalstudy of the Mini-Mental State Examination in normal aging. Am J Epidemiol1997;145(6):498-506[13] Jicha GA, Parisi JE, Dickson DW, Johnson K, Cha R, Ivnik RJ, Tangalos EG, Boeve BF,Knopman DS, Braak H,Petersen RC. Neuropathologic outcome of mild cognitive impairmentfollowing progression to clinical dementia. Arch Neurol 2006;63(5):674-81[14] Jorm AF, Scott R, Henderson AS,Kay DW. Educational level differences on the Mini-Mental State: the role of test bias. Psychol Med 1988;18(3):727-31[15] Kramer J, Delis D,Daniel M. Sex differences in verbal learning. J Clin Psychol1988;44(907-915[16] Laird NM,Ware JH. Random-effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics1982;38(4):963-74[17] Launer LJ, Dinkgreve MA, Jonker C, Hooijer C,Lindeboom J. Are age and educationindependent correlates of the Mini-Mental State Exam performance of community-dwellingelderly? J Gerontol 1993;48(6):P271-7[18] Le Carret N, Lafont S, Mayo W,Fabrigoule C. The effect of education on cognitiveperformances and its implication for the constitution of the cognitive reserve. DevNeuropsychol 2003;23(3):317-3719
Page 1 and 2:
Université Victor Segalen Bordeaux
Page 3 and 4:
3RemerciementsA Monsieur Jean-Louis
Page 5 and 6:
5Un immense merci à tous ceux que
Page 7 and 8:
7A Delphine et ses mille et une his
Page 9 and 10:
TABLE DES MATIÈRES 92.3.2 Estimati
Page 11 and 12:
TABLE DES MATIÈRES 116.3.1 Adéqua
Page 13 and 14:
Introduction 13ans atteintes d’un
Page 15 and 16:
Introduction 15Mais, pour l’insta
Page 17 and 18:
Introduction 171.2 Problèmes méth
Page 19 and 20:
Introduction 191.2.3 Association en
Page 21 and 22:
Introduction 21QUID suggère que le
Page 23 and 24:
Chapitre 2Etat des connaissancesCe
Page 25 and 26:
Etat des connaissances 25Plusieurs
Page 27 and 28:
Etat des connaissances 27Prise en c
Page 29 and 30:
Etat des connaissances 29Extensions
Page 31 and 32:
Etat des connaissances 31données s
Page 33 and 34:
Etat des connaissances 33variables
Page 35 and 36:
Etat des connaissances 35(2000) ne
Page 37 and 38:
Etat des connaissances 372.3 Modél
Page 39 and 40:
Etat des connaissances 39chapitre 3
Page 41 and 42:
Etat des connaissances 41de mélang
Page 43 and 44:
Etat des connaissances 43Hawkins et
Page 45 and 46:
Etat des connaissances 45tique de d
Page 47 and 48:
Etat des connaissances 47L’estima
Page 49 and 50:
Etat des connaissances 49normales s
Page 51 and 52:
Etat des connaissances 512.4 Modél
Page 53 and 54:
Etat des connaissances 53en tant qu
Page 55 and 56:
Etat des connaissances 55interactio
Page 57 and 58:
Etat des connaissances 57décrite p
Page 59 and 60:
Etat des connaissances 59entre l’
Page 61 and 62:
Etat des connaissances 612.4.3 Cas
Page 63 and 64:
Etat des connaissances 63l’inform
Page 65 and 66:
Modèle nonlinéaire à processus l
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Chapitre 4Modèle nonlinéaire à c
Page 95 and 96:
Modèle nonlinéaire à classes lat
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Chapitre 6Discussion et perspective
Page 151 and 152:
Discussion et perspectives 151la pr
Page 153 and 154:
Discussion et perspectives 153Varia
Page 155 and 156:
Discussion et perspectives 1556.2 M
Page 157 and 158:
Discussion et perspectives 157à cl
Page 160 and 161:
Discussion et perspectives 160effet
Page 162 and 163:
Discussion et perspectives 162Dans
Page 164 and 165:
Chapitre 7BibliographieAmieva, H.,
Page 166 and 167: Bibliographie 1661, S19-25.Brown, E
Page 168 and 169: Bibliographie 168Sons, New-York.Fol
Page 170 and 171: Bibliographie 170Hogan, J. W. et La
Page 172 and 173: Bibliographie 172Lin, H., McCulloch
Page 174 and 175: Bibliographie 174Park, CA.Muthén,
Page 176 and 177: Bibliographie 176Schlattmann, P. (2
Page 178 and 179: Bibliographie 178in the random-effe
Page 180 and 181: Chapitre 8Annexes8.1 Liste des publ
Page 182 and 183: Annexes 182Pau (France)Communicatio
Page 184 and 185: Annexes 184166 C. Proust, H. Jacqmi
Page 192 and 193: AnnexesAmerican Journal of Epidemio
Page 194 and 195: Annexes 194Psychometric Tests’ Se
Page 200 and 201: Annexes 200Abstract :When investiga
Page 202 and 203: Annexes 202educated subjects. This
Page 204 and 205: Annexes 204(iii) the recognition fo
Page 206 and 207: Annexes 206Explanatory variablesIn
Page 208 and 209: Annexes 208IST15 (median=28, IQR=24
Page 210 and 211: Annexes 210and on the mean evolutio
Page 212 and 213: Annexes 212These findings should be
Page 214 and 215: Annexes 214Appendix : model specifi
Page 218 and 219: Annexes 218[19] Letenneur L, Commen
Page 220 and 221: Annexes 220Figure 1 : (A) Predicted
Page 222 and 223: Annexes 222Table 1: demographic and
Page 224: Annexes 224MMSE 0.0037 * 0.0013,0.0
show all

Télécharger le texte intégral - ISPED-Enseignement à distance

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?