20.07.2013 Views

The phonology and morphology of Filomeno Mata Totonac

The phonology and morphology of Filomeno Mata Totonac

The phonology and morphology of Filomeno Mata Totonac

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

42) "aalantuunú n k"tatá<br />

/#aa=la-tuunu k-#tatá-aa/<br />

NEG-POT-apart 1SUB-sleep-IMPF<br />

‘I can’t sleep apart from others’ (6,40 jsf)<br />

<strong>The</strong> final group <strong>of</strong> preverbal morphemes includes the negative <strong>and</strong> negative polarity items in<br />

P19-16. <strong>The</strong>se give every sign <strong>of</strong> being clitics: they are never stressed; can take as a base words<br />

<strong>of</strong> various classes (see §3.3.9.1); most exhibit nasal epenthesis; <strong>and</strong> they occur in the outermost<br />

positions. <strong>The</strong> exceptions which never exhibit nasal epenthesis are NEG "aa= (see example 42)<br />

<strong>and</strong> STILL (NOT) naa- (example 43) in preverbal positions 19 <strong>and</strong> 18 respectively (recall that<br />

nasal epenthesis is an optional process that shows inter- <strong>and</strong> intra-speaker variation). It is<br />

possible that the failure <strong>of</strong> the negation marker "aa= to undergo nasal epenthesis helps to<br />

disambiguate it from homophonous negative polarity (<strong>and</strong> relativizer) "aa=, meaning ‘where’<br />

(example 44).<br />

43) "aanaalaktlaawán<br />

/#aa=naa-la-k-tlaawan-aa/<br />

NEG-ALSO-POT-1SUB-walk-IMPF<br />

‘I still can’t walk’ (7,130 mjl)<br />

44) "aanta’aktayaac%á’a&<br />

/#aa=ta-ak-ta-yaa-c"á’a&-li&/<br />

where-3SUB.pl-HEAD-INC-st<strong>and</strong>ing-THERE<br />

‘where they l<strong>and</strong>ed’ (6,137 mjl)<br />

Preverbally, then, the structure is fairly straight-forward: negation <strong>and</strong> the negative polarity items<br />

are clitics, as are certain adverbials; all other morphemes in positions 1-13 show consistent signs<br />

<strong>of</strong> being affixes. Only the mood/tense morphemes, by their unstressability, reveal a weaker<br />

attachment to the stem than other affixes. <strong>The</strong> situation among the outer post-verbal morphemes<br />

is more problematical.<br />

6.5.3.2.2 Post-verbal outer morphemes. All post-verbal morphemes are included in the stress<br />

zone (one vacuously: adverbial =ts’!, without a vowel node, cannot be stressed), <strong>and</strong> all<br />

morphemes from S1-S12 meet all criteria for affixhood. It is the morphemes in S13 to S15 that<br />

provide more grist for analysis.<br />

! #'#!

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!