With-Love-to-Muhammad

82 With Love to Muhammad sa the Khātam-un-Nabiyyīn
connotation of Khātam-un-Nabiyyīn, but the descent of
Jesus as from heaven would certainly change it. 73
Based on personal communication with Farhan Khan, we know
that he has read the book quoted above several times. Although
impossible, it would have been more appropriate for him to at
least try to refute the argument and logic given in the above
quotation instead of picking arguments derived from the insight
of individual Ahmadīs and refuting those. His example is like a
pigeon who closes his eyes in hopes that the cat disappears,
when in reality the cat is right in front of him and is about to
make a meal out of him! Closing his eyes to the flawless logic of
the Ahmadiyya Muslim beliefs does not mean that it will go
away!!
Distinction between Law-Bearing and Non-Law-Bearing
Prophets
Under the section entitled No Firm Basis for the Distinction
Between Law-Bearing vs. Non-Law-Bearing Prophet, Farhan Khan
tries to refute the Ahmadiyya Muslim belief in a distinction
between law-bearing and non-law-bearing prophets by
presenting the following argument:
The crux of the refutation of this argument lays in an
important distinction between the methods Allāh
employs to communicate with his prophets. What is
known from the Qur’ān is that Allāh sent inspiration
(wahi) to all of the Prophets, but did not necessarily
speak (kalama) to them all.
73
A Misconception Removed, Hazrat Mirzā Ghulām Ahmad as , (Islāmabad,
Islām International Publications Ltd., 2007), Pages 3-5