With-Love-to-Muhammad

Last Law-bearing Prophet sa 65
accusations of Farhan Khan fall on the saints of the Muslim
ummah, not the Ahmadī Muslims. This also exposes his
dishonesty and his shallow attempt to lead people astray with
his false accusations against Ahmadiyya, the True Islām.
To prove this beyond a shadow of doubt, a few examples
from the writings of great saints of the Muslim ummah are being
presented here. Hazrat Muhy-ud-Dīn Ibn ‘Arabī rh , a great saint,
expresses his belief in the following quotation:
The prophethood which came to an end with the
advent of the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of
Allāh be on him) was Tashrī’ī Nubuwwat [i.e., a
prophet with a new book and new law]. There is no
room for such prophethood after the Holy Qur’ān.
This is the correct meaning of the hadith, which
contains the Holy Prophet’s saying that there is to be
no prophet after him. The hadith only conveys that
after the Holy Prophet, there can be no prophet who
will replace his sharī‘ah with another one. Henceforth,
whenever any prophet comes, he will be subordinate
to him and his sharī‘ah. 47
Similarly, Sheikh Balī Āfandī wrote in Fusūs-ul-Hakam, “Khātamur-Rusul
is one after whom no law-bearing prophet can come”. 48
The famous saint, Hazrat Syed ‘Abd-ul-Karīm Gilānī wrote:
With the advent of the Holy Prophet (peace and
blessings of Allāh be on him), prophethood bearing a
new law came to an end. The Holy Prophet (peace
and blessings of Allāh be on him) was called Khātam-
47
Futūhāt Makkiyyah, Volume 2, Chapter 73, Page 3
48
Fusūs Al-Hakam,Page 56