With-Love-to-Muhammad

Opinion of the Sahāba ra , Ā’immah, and Mujaddidīn rh 237
prophecy did not come to pass in their lifetimes. Due to this
reason, they also cannot be held responsible for holding this
opinion. Instead, we are the ones who are responsible in the
Eyes of Allāh, the Exalted, because in our time, a person has
claimed to be that Messiah and he has shown very clear and
powerful signs of his truth and that person is Hazrat Mirzā
Ghulām Ahmad Qādiānī as !
Finally, Farhan Khan criticizes Hazrat Mirzā Ghulām
Ahmad Qādiānī as for allegedly changing his opinion in regards
to the finality of prophethood. This is not the case! The
Promised Messiah as states:
Wherever I have denied being a prophet or
messenger, it has only been in the sense that I have
not brought an independent law nor am I an
independent prophet. I am a messenger and prophet
only in the sense that I have received spiritual grace
from the Messenger sa whom I follow, and, having
received his name for myself, and through him, I
have received knowledge of the unseen from God.
But I have not come with a new law. I have never
denied being called a Nabī [prophet] in this sense. 228
Further clarification of what he meant to say in all his books is
given in the following quotation:
...the charge preferred against me that it is as if I
claim a kind of nubuwwat which causes me to become
separate from Islām, and which means that I consider
myself a kind of Nabī who is not bound by the Holy
Qur’ān, and that I have instituted a new kalimah and
228
A Misconception Removed, Page 10