With-Love-to-Muhammad

76 With Love to Muhammad sa the Khātam-un-Nabiyyīn
the official argument of Ahmadī Muslims 64 . His reasoning is
that he wants to avoid the straw man fallacy but this is a very
strange excuse! By choosing to present that argument, his
motive is quite the opposite of what he is saying. The
Ahmadiyya Muslim argument is presented by him in a form
that can easily be refuted. Although the Ahmadiyya Muslim
Jamā‘at is not obliged to answer such ridiculous allegations that
attempt to discredit its beliefs, we will respond regardless for
the benefit of the reader.
After making a lengthy discussion, Farhan Khan
summarizes the Ahmadī belief as follows:
[No more laws from 5:3] + [No more prophets from 33:41] = [No
more law-bearing Prophets]
This is a dishonest and pathetic attempt to discredit Ahmadiyya
Muslim beliefs. At no time in its entire history has the
Ahmadiyya Muslim Jamā‘at accepted that 33:41 states that there
are “No more prophets.” If Farhan Khan was being intellectually
honest, he should have chosen to point out which Ahmadī
literature or which Ahmadī scholar has stated that there are “no
more prophets” according to 33:41. Nevertheless, for the sake of
argument, his rebuttal is quoted below:
...Suppose a grocery store owner was checking his
inventory and realized he had overstocked on apples
and sweets. Immediately, he put two requests to his
local supplier: not to deliver any more apples or any
more sweets.
Next, consider these two statements from the
perspective of the supplier. He has been told (1) not
64
Khan, With Love, 30