With-Love-to-Muhammad

Death of Hazrat ‘Īsā as bin Mariam ra 195
apart and he wins. If he cannot, and most certainly he will not
(Inshā’ Allāh), he should give up his claims and accept the truth
of Islām Ahmadiyya.
Why is it not possible for Hazrat ‘Īsā as to return?
Farhan Khan says, “Muhammad sa was the last person
given this position of prophethood. After him, no one else is
given the position of prophethood, not even ‘Esā bin Mariam as ,
because he never lost his status as a Prophet.” 208 This is true but
irrelevant. The Ahmadiyya Muslim argument is that the very
coming of ‘Īsā as as a prophet breaks Khan’s absoluteness of the
concept of the “end of prophethood.” What is more important is
that it breaks the Seal of prophethood! The Promised Messiah as
explained this when he wrote as follows:
The true connotation of Khātamun Nabiyyīn requires
that if anyone calls himself a prophet while there
remains the slightest veil of estrangement, 209 such a
person will be guilty of breaking the Seal of Khātamun
Nabiyyīn. But he who is so lost in the Khātamun
Nabiyyīn sa that he receives his sa name and reflects his sa
countenance, will, on account of this complete unity
and harmony, be called a prophet without
contravening the Seal; for he is Muhammad sa , though
by way of zill. Thus, despite the claim of
prophethood by the person who is named
Muhammad and Ahmad by way of zill, our lord and
master Muhammad sa would still be the Khātamun
Nabiyyīn, inasmuch as this second Muhammad is a
208
Khan, With Love, Page 25
209
Estrangement between him and the Holy Prophet sa . [Publishers]