14.07.2014 Views

Archie to SAM: A Short Operational History of Ground-Based Air ...

Archie to SAM: A Short Operational History of Ground-Based Air ...

Archie to SAM: A Short Operational History of Ground-Based Air ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

AIRMEN VERSUS GUERRILLAS<br />

war with tactics and aircraft designed for nuclear warfare. The<br />

best example <strong>of</strong> this mismatch was the F-105. A fighter with<br />

an internal bomb bay—a contradiction in terms—it was the US<br />

<strong>Air</strong> Force’s workhorse, flying many <strong>of</strong> the missions over the<br />

north and suffering the most damage. 9<br />

The United States, for its entire technological prowess, was<br />

ill equipped in other areas as well. At the beginning <strong>of</strong> the air<br />

war, the United States was still using unguided (dumb) munitions,<br />

just as <strong>Air</strong>men had used in World War I! Thus, aircrews<br />

had <strong>to</strong> overfly their targets, which proved dangerous and <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

fatal. 10 Second, the United States had inadequate electronic<br />

ECM. Although Strategic <strong>Air</strong> Command (SAC) B-52s were reasonably<br />

equipped, TAC fighters were not. The irony therefore is<br />

that, until late in the war, the better-equipped B-52s operated<br />

unopposed over South Vietnam, while throughout the war,<br />

fighters flew against the growing and increasingly lethal defenses<br />

in North Vietnam.<br />

Another fac<strong>to</strong>r, perhaps the most important, was that the<br />

Americans underestimated the power <strong>of</strong> the defense and the<br />

abilities <strong>of</strong> the North Vietnamese. The <strong>Air</strong>men focused on the<br />

weapons on which <strong>Air</strong>men always focus, where the glamour<br />

and glory are, fighters and air-<strong>to</strong>-air combat. It is true that the<br />

North Vietnamese built up their air force. But, this air force<br />

proved as elusive as the Vietcong, using guerrilla tactics <strong>of</strong> hitand-run<br />

and fighting only when circumstances were favorable.<br />

With the major exception <strong>of</strong> Operation Bolo in January 1967,<br />

when US fighter pilots ambushed the North Vietnamese fighters<br />

and destroyed seven MiGs without a loss, American <strong>Air</strong>men<br />

did not engage in major air battles and thus were unable <strong>to</strong><br />

rack up scores as they had in World War II and Korea. 11 While<br />

glamorous as always, a matter <strong>of</strong> pride, and a symbol <strong>of</strong> success,<br />

air-<strong>to</strong>-air combat was neither frequent nor important in the<br />

Vietnam air war. The principal Communist weapon against US<br />

aircraft was AAA. American <strong>Air</strong>men not only underestimated<br />

North Vietnamese defenses, they especially underestimated<br />

the impact <strong>of</strong> flak. Both were serious mistakes.<br />

The North Vietnamese fielded a formidable ground-based air<br />

defense system. In early 1965, the North Vietnamese manned<br />

about 1,200 antiaircraft guns, which they increased <strong>to</strong> almost<br />

117

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!