14.07.2014 Views

Archie to SAM: A Short Operational History of Ground-Based Air ...

Archie to SAM: A Short Operational History of Ground-Based Air ...

Archie to SAM: A Short Operational History of Ground-Based Air ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

AIRMEN VERSUS GUERRILLAS<br />

but modified D models and 99 <strong>of</strong> the later G models. Only half<br />

<strong>of</strong> the G models had upgraded ECM equipment, which proved<br />

<strong>to</strong> be one <strong>of</strong> the critical fac<strong>to</strong>rs in determining which aircraft<br />

the <strong>SAM</strong>s hit, the big killers <strong>of</strong> the B-52s. 44 Although the defenders<br />

fired more <strong>SAM</strong>s at the B-52Ds, more B-52Gs were hit<br />

and downed, with five destroyed on the first three missions.<br />

A second problem was that the B-52s were controlled, or<br />

better put, overcontrolled, from SAC headquarters in Omaha.<br />

SAC formed the basic battle plan and tactics literally thousands<br />

<strong>of</strong> miles from the actual combat. Initially, SAC had a policy <strong>of</strong> no<br />

maneuvers on the bomb run, although such maneuvers <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

permitted aircraft <strong>to</strong> elude the <strong>SAM</strong>s. 45 SAC also mandated a<br />

“press-on” procedure, which dictated that bombers continue<br />

their missions despite the loss <strong>of</strong> engines, computers, and most<br />

critically, ECM equipment. 46 Not surprisingly, with one headquarters<br />

controlling the bombers and another the support aircraft,<br />

there were coordination problems between the bombers<br />

and their escorts, including two instances in which B-52s fired<br />

on US aircraft. 47 Other coordination difficulties included US<br />

radios jammed by EB-66 ECM and friendly radar severely degraded<br />

by B-52 ECM. 48<br />

Losses indicated that the ECM was inadequate. First, B-52<br />

ECM protection markedly declined in the 100-degree turn immediately<br />

after bomb release, as the bombers’ bank reduced<br />

the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the spot jammers. 49 Second, winds that<br />

differed from forecasts in direction and speed upset the ECM<br />

protection <strong>of</strong> the chaff corridors. For example, on 20 December,<br />

only four <strong>of</strong> 27 B-52 cells received chaff protection at the<br />

bomb-release line, and all <strong>of</strong> the B-52s downed were 5 <strong>to</strong> 10<br />

miles from chaff cover. Third, the North Vietnamese gunners<br />

surprised the American <strong>Air</strong>men by using radar designed and<br />

deployed for gun control (designated T8209) <strong>to</strong> guide the SA-2s.<br />

American <strong>Air</strong>men lacked equipment <strong>to</strong> both warn <strong>of</strong> and jam<br />

this “new” I-band radar. 50<br />

The North Vietnamese <strong>to</strong>ok advantage <strong>of</strong> the stereotyped tactics<br />

by salvoing barrages <strong>of</strong> <strong>SAM</strong>s at the point where the B-52s<br />

executed their post-target turns. <strong>SAM</strong> opera<strong>to</strong>rs limited radar<br />

guidance <strong>to</strong> the last five <strong>to</strong> 10 seconds <strong>of</strong> intercept, which made<br />

133

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!