14.07.2014 Views

Archie to SAM: A Short Operational History of Ground-Based Air ...

Archie to SAM: A Short Operational History of Ground-Based Air ...

Archie to SAM: A Short Operational History of Ground-Based Air ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE<br />

ment <strong>to</strong> curtail ABM deployment. McNamara <strong>to</strong>ld the Russians<br />

that limitations on defensive weapons were necessary <strong>to</strong> avoid<br />

an arms race. In response, the Soviet leader pounded the table<br />

and angrily replied: “Defense is moral, <strong>of</strong>fense is immoral!” 33<br />

Pressure on the administration mounted shortly thereafter when<br />

the Chinese announced they had de<strong>to</strong>nated a hydrogen bomb.<br />

A few days after the Glassboro meeting, Johnson <strong>to</strong>ld McNamara<br />

that he would approve deployment. 34<br />

In September 1967, McNamara delivered a key speech in San<br />

Francisco. Although he made clear that an ABM defense against<br />

a Soviet ICBM attack was both futile and expensive, the secretary<br />

<strong>of</strong> defense announced that the United States would deploy<br />

a “light” ABM system <strong>to</strong> protect the United States from a<br />

Chinese attack. 35 Another purpose <strong>of</strong> the US ABM system was <strong>to</strong><br />

protect US (Minuteman) ICBMs and the United States against<br />

an accidental ICBM launch. The system would consist <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Spartan area defense and Sprint terminal defense <strong>of</strong> 25 major<br />

cities. The system would be known as Sentinel and cost an estimated<br />

$4–$5 billion. 36<br />

ABM supporters had won a significant vic<strong>to</strong>ry and thought<br />

the way was now clear. But if politics played an important role<br />

in bringing this about, the politics <strong>of</strong> the times played a role in<br />

derailing, or at least deflecting, ABM deployment. Citizen groups<br />

rose <strong>to</strong> oppose siting <strong>of</strong> the missiles in and around the major<br />

cities in which they lived. This was unexpected, as public opinion<br />

polls indicated that the public (the 40 percent <strong>of</strong> the public who<br />

expressed an opinion) supported ABM deployment by a margin<br />

<strong>of</strong> almost two <strong>to</strong> one. The problem was the classic one <strong>of</strong><br />

“not in my backyard.” Stimulated by the activism and antiestablishment<br />

wave <strong>of</strong> the late 1960s and supported by the<br />

leadership and advice <strong>of</strong> numerous articulate, activist, and<br />

passionate scientists and academics, a protest movement upset<br />

the administration’s and proponent’s plans. Another, albeit less<br />

pervasive fac<strong>to</strong>r, was that intelligence agencies downgraded<br />

the threat <strong>of</strong> Chinese ICBMs <strong>to</strong> the United States. 37<br />

Meanwhile, diplomatic efforts continued. In July 1968,<br />

President Johnson announced that talks with the Soviets would<br />

begin in September, but the Soviet invasion <strong>of</strong> Czechoslovakia<br />

193

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!