14.07.2014 Views

Archie to SAM: A Short Operational History of Ground-Based Air ...

Archie to SAM: A Short Operational History of Ground-Based Air ...

Archie to SAM: A Short Operational History of Ground-Based Air ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE<br />

Downing ballistic missiles after launch was essentially impossible.<br />

One secondary source claims there were two such instances,<br />

but, alas, neither can be confirmed. 3 There is documentation,<br />

however, <strong>of</strong> British investigations <strong>of</strong> the concept <strong>of</strong><br />

firing an artillery barrage in<strong>to</strong> the missile’s path after the defenders<br />

were alerted by radar. Although the British estimated<br />

that they could down 3 <strong>to</strong> 10 percent <strong>of</strong> the V-2s they engaged,<br />

the scheme would have required 20,000 shells <strong>to</strong> destroy one<br />

V-1. Of greater consequence, the British expected that about 2<br />

percent <strong>of</strong> the shells would not de<strong>to</strong>nate and that these duds and<br />

the debris from the exploding shells would cause more casualties<br />

than the V-2s that might be intercepted. 4<br />

Meanwhile, the US military was looking in<strong>to</strong> ballistic missile<br />

defense (BMD). In March 1946, the Army <strong>Air</strong> Forces (AAF) began<br />

two missile defense projects: General Electric’s Project Thumper<br />

(MX-795) that lasted only until March 1948, while the other,<br />

the University <strong>of</strong> Michigan’s Project Wizard (MX-794), survived<br />

somewhat longer. It was designed <strong>to</strong> defend the continental<br />

United States but was pitted against the Army’s Nike project that<br />

was intended for theater operations. In 1958, the <strong>Air</strong> Force<br />

conceded it was <strong>to</strong>o costly, and thus the Department <strong>of</strong> Defense<br />

(DOD) merged it with the Nike-Zeus project. 5<br />

Army Development<br />

The Army was making progress on the issue <strong>of</strong> ballistic missile<br />

defense. In January 1949, the Army established a formal<br />

requirement for ballistic missile defense that early in 1951<br />

spawned the PLATO Project that was <strong>to</strong> provide antiballistic<br />

missile (ABM) protection for the field army. The Army increased<br />

the requirement in 1954 <strong>to</strong> defend against intercontinental<br />

ballistic missiles (ICBM) in the 1960–70 time frame. A number<br />

<strong>of</strong> studies emerged, with one in 1956 suggesting a Nike-Zeus<br />

variant. PLATO was shut down in 1959, not for technical reasons,<br />

but because <strong>of</strong> funding problems. 6<br />

The follow-on <strong>to</strong> PLATO was the Field Army Ballistic Missile<br />

Defense System (FABMDS) program that began in 1959. However,<br />

as this had a long lead time, with an expected operational<br />

date <strong>of</strong> 1967, the Army sought other equipment. Early on, the<br />

182

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!