Archie to SAM: A Short Operational History of Ground-Based Air ...
Archie to SAM: A Short Operational History of Ground-Based Air ...
Archie to SAM: A Short Operational History of Ground-Based Air ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
GROUND-BASED AIR DEFENSE SINCE 1990<br />
AAA at the airmen but were able <strong>to</strong> down only one F-117 and<br />
one F-16. However, the loss <strong>of</strong> the F-117 was shocking, as none<br />
had been hit, much less lost, in the Gulf War. The cause <strong>of</strong> loss<br />
was not made public, but it was probably due <strong>to</strong> an SA-3. Nevertheless,<br />
the aircraft loss rate was less than that <strong>of</strong> the Gulf<br />
War. However, the loss <strong>of</strong> 15 UAVs by one account (25 UAVs by<br />
another) and three <strong>to</strong> five percent <strong>of</strong> the sorties indicates both<br />
their vulnerability and, in fact, why they were employed. 41<br />
The Serbs learned from the Iraqi experience. On only a few<br />
occasions did they directly confront allied forces; instead, they<br />
attempted <strong>to</strong> preserve their air defense system as a force in<br />
being. They were successful, as Serbs were firing as many <strong>SAM</strong>s<br />
at allied aircraft on the last days <strong>of</strong> the operation as on the<br />
first. Thus, the <strong>Air</strong>men had <strong>to</strong> maintain high levels <strong>of</strong> support<br />
aircraft and operate from higher altitudes (above 15,000 feet)<br />
throughout the campaign, unlike the action in Iraq where both<br />
altitude and support sorties declined later in the operation<br />
after the air defenses had been suppressed. 42<br />
The United States responded <strong>to</strong> the 11 September 2001 attacks<br />
on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon with an assault<br />
on the terrorist sanctuary in Afghanistan as well as the<br />
government <strong>of</strong> Afghanistan that protected them. On 7 Oc<strong>to</strong>ber,<br />
US air strikes hit command and control, air defense, and airfields<br />
in Afghanistan. Compared <strong>to</strong> the operations against Iraq<br />
and Serbia, the opposition was weaker and American capabilities<br />
greater. The American <strong>Air</strong>men used not only the equipment that<br />
proved so successful against Iraq but such new equipment as<br />
the B-1 and B-2 bombers, UAVs, and munitions: wind-corrected<br />
munitions dispenser, joint direct attack munition, and GPSguided<br />
bombs. Neither the terrorists nor the Afghans had much<br />
<strong>of</strong> an air defense. In the one-sided conflict, American <strong>Air</strong>men lost<br />
three aircraft in accidents and two <strong>of</strong> three UAVs <strong>to</strong> icing but<br />
none <strong>to</strong> enemy causes. Against this minimal resistance, the principal<br />
problem was that <strong>of</strong> distinguishing the correct target. 43<br />
A year and a half later, Iraq was the site <strong>of</strong> another swift war.<br />
On 21 March 2003, coalition air forces began air strikes on<br />
Iraq. Iraqi air defenses were significantly weaker than they<br />
were in the first Gulf War, consisting <strong>of</strong> 325 combat aircraft<br />
and 210 large <strong>SAM</strong>s. Coalition air forces were also smaller in<br />
231