14.07.2014 Views

Archie to SAM: A Short Operational History of Ground-Based Air ...

Archie to SAM: A Short Operational History of Ground-Based Air ...

Archie to SAM: A Short Operational History of Ground-Based Air ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

GROUND-BASED AIR DEFENSE SINCE 1990<br />

AAA at the airmen but were able <strong>to</strong> down only one F-117 and<br />

one F-16. However, the loss <strong>of</strong> the F-117 was shocking, as none<br />

had been hit, much less lost, in the Gulf War. The cause <strong>of</strong> loss<br />

was not made public, but it was probably due <strong>to</strong> an SA-3. Nevertheless,<br />

the aircraft loss rate was less than that <strong>of</strong> the Gulf<br />

War. However, the loss <strong>of</strong> 15 UAVs by one account (25 UAVs by<br />

another) and three <strong>to</strong> five percent <strong>of</strong> the sorties indicates both<br />

their vulnerability and, in fact, why they were employed. 41<br />

The Serbs learned from the Iraqi experience. On only a few<br />

occasions did they directly confront allied forces; instead, they<br />

attempted <strong>to</strong> preserve their air defense system as a force in<br />

being. They were successful, as Serbs were firing as many <strong>SAM</strong>s<br />

at allied aircraft on the last days <strong>of</strong> the operation as on the<br />

first. Thus, the <strong>Air</strong>men had <strong>to</strong> maintain high levels <strong>of</strong> support<br />

aircraft and operate from higher altitudes (above 15,000 feet)<br />

throughout the campaign, unlike the action in Iraq where both<br />

altitude and support sorties declined later in the operation<br />

after the air defenses had been suppressed. 42<br />

The United States responded <strong>to</strong> the 11 September 2001 attacks<br />

on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon with an assault<br />

on the terrorist sanctuary in Afghanistan as well as the<br />

government <strong>of</strong> Afghanistan that protected them. On 7 Oc<strong>to</strong>ber,<br />

US air strikes hit command and control, air defense, and airfields<br />

in Afghanistan. Compared <strong>to</strong> the operations against Iraq<br />

and Serbia, the opposition was weaker and American capabilities<br />

greater. The American <strong>Air</strong>men used not only the equipment that<br />

proved so successful against Iraq but such new equipment as<br />

the B-1 and B-2 bombers, UAVs, and munitions: wind-corrected<br />

munitions dispenser, joint direct attack munition, and GPSguided<br />

bombs. Neither the terrorists nor the Afghans had much<br />

<strong>of</strong> an air defense. In the one-sided conflict, American <strong>Air</strong>men lost<br />

three aircraft in accidents and two <strong>of</strong> three UAVs <strong>to</strong> icing but<br />

none <strong>to</strong> enemy causes. Against this minimal resistance, the principal<br />

problem was that <strong>of</strong> distinguishing the correct target. 43<br />

A year and a half later, Iraq was the site <strong>of</strong> another swift war.<br />

On 21 March 2003, coalition air forces began air strikes on<br />

Iraq. Iraqi air defenses were significantly weaker than they<br />

were in the first Gulf War, consisting <strong>of</strong> 325 combat aircraft<br />

and 210 large <strong>SAM</strong>s. Coalition air forces were also smaller in<br />

231

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!