Archie to SAM: A Short Operational History of Ground-Based Air ...
Archie to SAM: A Short Operational History of Ground-Based Air ...
Archie to SAM: A Short Operational History of Ground-Based Air ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE<br />
the political aspects by using the Patriot. However questionable<br />
BMD was in fact, it appeared successful <strong>to</strong> the press and<br />
public, and this political and psychological impression was<br />
most important. 84<br />
The Patriot-Scud duel had implications well beyond the Persian<br />
Gulf War. The Iraqi Scud indicated the threat that faced<br />
the United States and its friends. The war showed how this<br />
crude weapon could create great political problems and force<br />
a significant diversion <strong>of</strong> military resources. Especially grave<br />
were the implications <strong>of</strong> ballistic missiles armed with nuclear,<br />
biological, or chemical warheads. At the same time, the apparent<br />
success <strong>of</strong> the Patriot against the Scud gave impetus <strong>to</strong><br />
BMD programs.<br />
Notes<br />
1. A fuller version <strong>of</strong> the ballistic missile defense s<strong>to</strong>ry can be found in<br />
this author’s “Hitting a Bullet with a Bullet: A His<strong>to</strong>ry <strong>of</strong> Ballistic Missile Defense,”<br />
CADRE Research Paper 2000–02 (Maxwell AFB, Ala.: College <strong>of</strong> Aerospace<br />
Doctrine, Research and Education, 2000).<br />
2. United States Strategic Bombing Survey, Overall Report (Washing<strong>to</strong>n,<br />
D.C.: Government Printing Office [GPO], 1945), 88–89; Adam Gruen, Preemptive<br />
Defense: Allied <strong>Air</strong> Power versus Hitler’s V-Weapons, 1943–1945 (Washing<strong>to</strong>n,<br />
D.C.: <strong>Air</strong> Force His<strong>to</strong>ry and Museums Program, 1998), 15; Robert Allen,<br />
“Counterforce in World War II,” in Theater Missile Defense: Systems and<br />
Issues—1993 (Washing<strong>to</strong>n, D.C.: American Institute <strong>of</strong> Aeronautics and<br />
Astronautics, 1993), 109; and Military Intelligence Division, Handbook on<br />
Guided Missiles <strong>of</strong> Germany and Japan, February 1946, R.<br />
3. David Johnson, V-1, V-2: Hitler’s Vengeance on London (New York:<br />
Stein and Day, 1981), 168–69.<br />
4. Donald Baucom, The Origins <strong>of</strong> SDI, 1944–1983 (Lawrence, Kans.:<br />
University Press <strong>of</strong> Kansas, 1992), 4; and Frederick Pile, Ack-Ack: Britain’s<br />
Defence against <strong>Air</strong> Attack during the Second World War (London: Harrap,<br />
1949), 388.<br />
5. Army Ordnance Missile Command, Surface-<strong>to</strong>-<strong>Air</strong> Missiles Reference<br />
Book, V-1, 2, R; Stephen Blanchette, “The <strong>Air</strong> Force and Ballistic Missile Defense”<br />
(thesis, <strong>Air</strong> Command and Staff College, February 1987), 10–11, 15–16,<br />
AUL; Baucom, The Origins <strong>of</strong> SDI, 4, 6, 12–13; Georgia Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology,<br />
“Missile Catalog: A Compendium <strong>of</strong> Guided Missile and Seeker Information,”<br />
April 1956, 101, 128, 130, R; “His<strong>to</strong>ry <strong>of</strong> <strong>Air</strong> Research and Development Command:<br />
July–December 1954,” vol.1, 225–27, His<strong>to</strong>rical Research Agency,<br />
Maxwell AFB, Ala.; and James Walker, Frances Martin, and Sharon Watkins,<br />
Strategic Defense: Four Decades <strong>of</strong> Progress (n.p.: His<strong>to</strong>rical Office, US Army<br />
Space and Strategic Defense Command, 1995), 4.<br />
208