Archie to SAM: A Short Operational History of Ground-Based Air ...
Archie to SAM: A Short Operational History of Ground-Based Air ...
Archie to SAM: A Short Operational History of Ground-Based Air ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ANTIAIRCRAFT DEFENSE THROUGH WORLD WAR II<br />
The Germans introduced technological improvements <strong>to</strong> increase<br />
flak efficiency. In 1941, flak units began <strong>to</strong> get gun-laying<br />
radar. Radar was a major advance over sound detec<strong>to</strong>rs, the<br />
existing system used <strong>to</strong> detect and track aircraft. The older device<br />
suffered from short range and erratic performance. However,<br />
the German introduction <strong>of</strong> radar was slow, for as late as<br />
August 1944, the GAF was still using over 5,500 sound detec<strong>to</strong>rs.<br />
61 Another improvement was the introduction <strong>of</strong> grooved<br />
projectiles. These shells fragmented in<strong>to</strong> 80- <strong>to</strong> 100-gram pieces<br />
instead <strong>of</strong> the usual 1 <strong>to</strong> 7 grams, therefore causing much<br />
greater damage. 62 Incendiary shells also increased flak efficiency<br />
by three times, according <strong>to</strong> German estimates.<br />
Fuzes were another important advance. The Germans requested<br />
double fuzes (contact and timed) in 1943 and introduced<br />
them in<strong>to</strong> combat in late 1944. These fuzes increased the<br />
effectiveness <strong>of</strong> 88 mm guns five times; 105 mm guns, three<br />
times; and 128 mm guns, twice. But the Germans did not make<br />
the big change in fuzes; instead, the Allies introduced proximity<br />
fuzes. After the war, an American study calculated that had the<br />
Germans used proximity fuzes, they could have increased their<br />
flak efficiency by a fac<strong>to</strong>r <strong>of</strong> 3.4, making B-17 operations very<br />
hazardous and B-24 operations impractical. 63<br />
The Germans also experimented with a number <strong>of</strong> novel approaches<br />
<strong>to</strong> ground-based antiaircraft systems. They tested<br />
squeeze-bore and sabot devices, systems that fired a shell <strong>of</strong><br />
smaller size; for example, an 88 mm shell from a 105 mm gun.<br />
Such shells achieved greater velocities than they would have<br />
otherwise, as more powder pushed a smaller projectile. Neither<br />
system got in<strong>to</strong> service.<br />
The Germans examined yet another concept—flak rockets<br />
(later known as surface-<strong>to</strong>-air missiles or <strong>SAM</strong>). Although the<br />
Germans realized few positive results with the program in the<br />
1930s, they still gave the new technology consideration for the<br />
task <strong>of</strong> combating Allied air attacks. In early 1941, Gen Walter<br />
Dornberger, one <strong>of</strong> the key German decision makers in rocket<br />
and missile development, ordered a study <strong>of</strong> an antiaircraft<br />
missile with an altitude capability <strong>of</strong> up <strong>to</strong> 60,000 feet. Werner<br />
von Braun, chief <strong>of</strong> missile research at the Peenemünde test<br />
site, instead proposed using a rocket-powered intercep<strong>to</strong>r.<br />
34