14.07.2014 Views

Archie to SAM: A Short Operational History of Ground-Based Air ...

Archie to SAM: A Short Operational History of Ground-Based Air ...

Archie to SAM: A Short Operational History of Ground-Based Air ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ANTIAIRCRAFT DEFENSE THROUGH WORLD WAR II<br />

The Germans introduced technological improvements <strong>to</strong> increase<br />

flak efficiency. In 1941, flak units began <strong>to</strong> get gun-laying<br />

radar. Radar was a major advance over sound detec<strong>to</strong>rs, the<br />

existing system used <strong>to</strong> detect and track aircraft. The older device<br />

suffered from short range and erratic performance. However,<br />

the German introduction <strong>of</strong> radar was slow, for as late as<br />

August 1944, the GAF was still using over 5,500 sound detec<strong>to</strong>rs.<br />

61 Another improvement was the introduction <strong>of</strong> grooved<br />

projectiles. These shells fragmented in<strong>to</strong> 80- <strong>to</strong> 100-gram pieces<br />

instead <strong>of</strong> the usual 1 <strong>to</strong> 7 grams, therefore causing much<br />

greater damage. 62 Incendiary shells also increased flak efficiency<br />

by three times, according <strong>to</strong> German estimates.<br />

Fuzes were another important advance. The Germans requested<br />

double fuzes (contact and timed) in 1943 and introduced<br />

them in<strong>to</strong> combat in late 1944. These fuzes increased the<br />

effectiveness <strong>of</strong> 88 mm guns five times; 105 mm guns, three<br />

times; and 128 mm guns, twice. But the Germans did not make<br />

the big change in fuzes; instead, the Allies introduced proximity<br />

fuzes. After the war, an American study calculated that had the<br />

Germans used proximity fuzes, they could have increased their<br />

flak efficiency by a fac<strong>to</strong>r <strong>of</strong> 3.4, making B-17 operations very<br />

hazardous and B-24 operations impractical. 63<br />

The Germans also experimented with a number <strong>of</strong> novel approaches<br />

<strong>to</strong> ground-based antiaircraft systems. They tested<br />

squeeze-bore and sabot devices, systems that fired a shell <strong>of</strong><br />

smaller size; for example, an 88 mm shell from a 105 mm gun.<br />

Such shells achieved greater velocities than they would have<br />

otherwise, as more powder pushed a smaller projectile. Neither<br />

system got in<strong>to</strong> service.<br />

The Germans examined yet another concept—flak rockets<br />

(later known as surface-<strong>to</strong>-air missiles or <strong>SAM</strong>). Although the<br />

Germans realized few positive results with the program in the<br />

1930s, they still gave the new technology consideration for the<br />

task <strong>of</strong> combating Allied air attacks. In early 1941, Gen Walter<br />

Dornberger, one <strong>of</strong> the key German decision makers in rocket<br />

and missile development, ordered a study <strong>of</strong> an antiaircraft<br />

missile with an altitude capability <strong>of</strong> up <strong>to</strong> 60,000 feet. Werner<br />

von Braun, chief <strong>of</strong> missile research at the Peenemünde test<br />

site, instead proposed using a rocket-powered intercep<strong>to</strong>r.<br />

34

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!