14.07.2014 Views

Archie to SAM: A Short Operational History of Ground-Based Air ...

Archie to SAM: A Short Operational History of Ground-Based Air ...

Archie to SAM: A Short Operational History of Ground-Based Air ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SUMMARY, TRENDS, AND CONCLUSIONS<br />

<strong>Short</strong>ly after American involvement in the Vietnam War ended,<br />

air operations in the Middle East seemed <strong>to</strong> indicate the predominance<br />

<strong>of</strong> the defense. Unlike the 1967 Arab-Israeli War in<br />

which the Israeli <strong>Air</strong> Force was overwhelmingly triumphant, the<br />

1973 war indicated the renewed power <strong>of</strong> the defense. The<br />

Arabs violated two concepts <strong>of</strong> conventional war: attacking a<br />

country with superior military forces and attacking without air<br />

superiority. They advanced under a dense umbrella <strong>of</strong> <strong>SAM</strong>s and<br />

guns that downed many Israeli aircraft. Although the Israelis<br />

won the war, they suffered heavy aircraft losses, and their air<br />

force was unable <strong>to</strong> influence operations as it had in 1967.<br />

<strong>Ground</strong>-based air defenses appeared <strong>to</strong> have regained the edge.<br />

Operations in 1982 between the Arabs and Israelis cast doubt<br />

on these findings. In a short and sharp action, the Israeli air<br />

force won an air battle against Syrian MiGs and <strong>SAM</strong>s, a battle<br />

that was even more lopsided than their 1967 vic<strong>to</strong>ry.<br />

A few months earlier, on the other side <strong>of</strong> the world, the lessons<br />

<strong>of</strong> another conflict were less clear. In the Falklands, a small<br />

force from a Western power with superior technology defeated a<br />

larger force from a less-developed country. However, the Argentine<br />

air force battered the Royal Navy despite the restrictions <strong>of</strong><br />

range, old aircraft, old bombs, and lack <strong>of</strong> ECM. Although the<br />

British air defense imposed heavy losses on the attackers, the<br />

Argentines did get through <strong>to</strong> severely punish the defenders.<br />

The war in Afghanistan seemed <strong>to</strong> indicate the superiority <strong>of</strong><br />

the defense. This action pitted a modern air force against a<br />

lightly armed guerrilla force in rugged terrain, similar <strong>to</strong> the<br />

Vietnam War. The Soviet air force did reasonably well until the<br />

guerrillas employed advanced, man-portable <strong>SAM</strong>s. These inflicted<br />

substantial losses on the airmen, forced them <strong>to</strong> modify<br />

their tactics <strong>to</strong> reduce their vulnerability, and by so doing reduced<br />

their effectiveness. As a result, the military advantage<br />

shifted <strong>to</strong> the insurgents, who eventually drove the Soviets from<br />

the country and the war.<br />

In contrast, the <strong>of</strong>fense scored a quick and decisive vic<strong>to</strong>ry<br />

over the defense in the 1990–91 war in the Persian Gulf. It<br />

matched a large, well-equipped military—certainly by third world<br />

standards—against an even larger, better equipped and trained<br />

international coalition. The coalition used mass and superior<br />

272

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!