BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE 6. Army Ordnance Missile Command, “<strong>SAM</strong> Reference Book,” IV-16, V-1, 2–3, 6, R; John Bullard, “His<strong>to</strong>ry <strong>of</strong> the Field Army Ballistic Missile Defense System Project, 1959–1962,” December 1963, 5, R; Mary Cagle, “His<strong>to</strong>ry <strong>of</strong> Nike Hercules Weapon System,” April 1973, 191, R; and Woodrow Sigley, “Department <strong>of</strong> the Army Presentation <strong>to</strong> the Department <strong>of</strong> Defense Antiballistic Missile Committee: Scheduling and Costs for the Army Antiballistic Missile Program,” Oc<strong>to</strong>ber 1956, 4, R. 7. Bullard, His<strong>to</strong>ry, 2, 4, 9, 12–13, 80; Cagle, “Nike Hercules,” 173, 191, 192n; and Tony Cullen and Chris<strong>to</strong>pher Foss, eds., Jane’s Land-<strong>Based</strong> <strong>Air</strong> Defence, 1996–97, 9th ed. (Coulsdon, Surrey, U.K.: Jane’s, 1996), 290. 8. “ABM Research and Development at Bell Labora<strong>to</strong>ries: Project His<strong>to</strong>ry,” I-1, I-2, I-3, I-5, I-6, I-10, I-15, R; and Walker, Martin, and Watkins, Strategic Defense, 10. 9. “ABM Project His<strong>to</strong>ry,” I-15; Space and Missile Defense Command (SMDC), “A Discussion <strong>of</strong> Nike Zeus Decisions,” 5, HRA; and Ralph Taylor, “Space Counter Weapon Program: <strong>Air</strong> Defense Panel Presentation,” February 1961, HRA. 10. “ABM Project His<strong>to</strong>ry,” I-5, I-32; and K. Scott McMahon, Pursuit <strong>of</strong> the Shield: The US Quest for Limited Ballistic Missile Defense (Lanham, Md.: University Press <strong>of</strong> America, 1997), 15; SMDC, “Discussion <strong>of</strong> Nike Zeus Decisions,” 5–7; and Walker, Martin, and Watkins, Strategic Defense, 18. 11. Craig Eisendrath, Melvin Goodman, and Gerard Marsh, The Phan<strong>to</strong>m Defense: America’s Pursuit <strong>of</strong> the Star Wars Illusion (Westport, Conn.: Praeger, 2001), xix. 12. A clarification on terminology may be in order. In the early years, ballistic missile defense was oriented primarily, if not exclusively, against strategic missiles and was usually referred <strong>to</strong> as ABM. Later, defensive efforts were aimed at both strategic and tactical weapons, and the term ballistic missile defense was used. To keep matters simple, I have used ABM and BMD interchangeably <strong>to</strong> indicate ballistic missile defense in general against either strategic or tactical weapons. See Daniel Papp, “From Project Thumper <strong>to</strong> SDI: The Role <strong>of</strong> Ballistic Missile Defense in US Security Policy,” <strong>Air</strong> Power Journal, April 1987, 41. 13. Army Ordnance Command, “<strong>SAM</strong> Reference Book,” IV-4; North American <strong>Air</strong> Defense Command (NORAD), “Quest for Nike Zeus and a Long- Range Intercep<strong>to</strong>r,” his<strong>to</strong>rical reference paper no. 6, 7–13, HRA; B. Bruce Briggs, The Shield <strong>of</strong> Faith: A Chronicle <strong>of</strong> Strategic Defense from Zeppelins <strong>to</strong> Star Wars (N.Y.: Simon and Schuster, 1988), 141; Edward Jayne, “The ABM Debate: Strategic Defense and National Security” (PhD diss., Political Science, Massachusetts Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology, 1969), 24; NORAD, “Quest for Nike Zeus,” 2; and Walker, Martin, and Watkins, Strategic Defense, 18. 14. For example, the Eisenhower administration cut the planned intercep<strong>to</strong>r fighter buy from 4,500 aircraft <strong>to</strong> 1,000, and the planned buy <strong>of</strong> 8,300 Nike Hercules <strong>to</strong> 2,400. See Briggs, The Shield <strong>of</strong> Faith, 137, 141; and Edward Reiss, The Strategic Defense Initiative (New York: Cambridge University, 1992), 22. 209
BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE 15. “ABM Project His<strong>to</strong>ry,” I-15; and NORAD, “Quest for Nike Zeus,” 1. 16. “ABM Project His<strong>to</strong>ry,” I-24, I-26; His<strong>to</strong>ry <strong>of</strong> the 1st Strategic Aerospace Division: The Nike–Zeus Program, August 1959–April 1963, 17–18, 29, HRA; and Walker, Martin, and Watkins, Strategic Defense, 19. 17. “ABM Project His<strong>to</strong>ry,” I-22, I-23. 18. Walker, Martin, and Watkins, Strategic Defense, 19. 19. SMDC, “Discussion <strong>of</strong> Nike-Zeus Decisions,” 10; and NORAD, “Quest for Nike Zeus,” 16–17. 20. SMDC, “Discussion <strong>of</strong> Nike-Zeus Decisions,” 8–9. 21. SMDC, “ABM Project His<strong>to</strong>ry,” 2–9, X-1, I-36, I-37; and Walker, Martin, and Watkins, Strategic Defense, 23. 22. Army Ordnance Missile Command, reference book, IV-14; “ABM Project His<strong>to</strong>ry,” I-37, 2–9, 9-1, IX-4, IX-21, IX-23; and Briggs, The Shield <strong>of</strong> Faith, 246–47. 23. “ABM Project His<strong>to</strong>ry,” I-37, I-44, II-1; Baucom, The Origins <strong>of</strong> SDI, 19; and Walker, Martin, and Watkins, Strategic Defense, 23, 26. 24. Other methods <strong>to</strong> enhance survivability <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fensive forces were <strong>to</strong> launch on warning, disperse, proliferate, and increase the number <strong>of</strong> weapons on alert. 25. Steven Zaloga, Soviet <strong>Air</strong> Defence Missiles: Design, Development and Tactics (Coulsdon, Surrey, U.K.: Jane’s, 1989), 121–22. 26. Galosh was a three-stage liquid-fuel rocket that carried a nuclear warhead <strong>of</strong> 2–3 mega<strong>to</strong>n yield out <strong>to</strong> a maximum range <strong>of</strong> 300 km and <strong>to</strong> a maximum altitude <strong>of</strong> 300 km. See David Yost, Soviet Ballistic Missiles and the Western Alliance (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University, 1988), 28; and Zaloga, Soviet <strong>Air</strong> Defence Missiles, 128, 133, 135, 137. 27. According <strong>to</strong> a highly placed <strong>of</strong>ficial and creditable academic, the majority <strong>of</strong> the intelligence community believed Tallinn was an air defense system. See Mor<strong>to</strong>n Halperin, The Decision <strong>to</strong> Deploy the ABM: Bureaucratic and Domestic Politics in the Johnson Administration (Washing<strong>to</strong>n, D.C.: Brookings Institution, 1973), 82; “ABM Project His<strong>to</strong>ry,” I-41, I-43, I-44, 2–4; Briggs, The Shield <strong>of</strong> Faith, 277; David Grogan, “Power Play: Theater Ballistic Missile Defense, National Ballistic Missile Defense and the ABM Treaty” (Master <strong>of</strong> Laws, George Washing<strong>to</strong>n University Law School, May 1998), 9; Jayne, “The ABM Debate,” 307, 318; Benjamin Lambeth, “Soviet Perspectives on the SDI,” in Samuel Wells and Robert Litwak, eds., Strategic Defenses and Soviet-American Relations (Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger, 1987), 50; Kerry Stryker, “A Bureaucratic Politics Examination <strong>of</strong> US Strategic Policy Making: A Case Study <strong>of</strong> the ABM” (MA thesis, San Diego State University, 1979), 107, 156; Walker, Martin, and Watkins, Strategic Defense, 29–30; and Zaloga, Soviet <strong>Air</strong> Defence Missiles, 15, 100, 102. 28. Douglas Johns<strong>to</strong>n, “Ballistic Missile Defense: Panacea or Pandora?” (PhD diss., Harvard, 1982), 195; and Yost, Soviet Ballistic Missiles, 26. 29. Interview with Lt Gen Austin Betts, 12 March 1971, 8, HRA; Briggs, The Shield <strong>of</strong> Faith, 259; Donald Bussey, “Deployment <strong>of</strong> Antiballistic Missile (ABM): The Pros and Cons,” Library <strong>of</strong> Congress Legislative Reference Service, 210
- Page 2 and 3:
Report Documentation Page Form Appr
- Page 4 and 5:
Air University Library Cataloging D
- Page 6 and 7:
Contents Chapter Page DISCLAIMER .
- Page 8 and 9:
CONTENTS Chapter Page 7 BALLISTIC M
- Page 10 and 11:
CONTENTS Figure Page 30 George Pred
- Page 12 and 13:
CONTENTS Figure Page 70 Blowpipe .
- Page 14 and 15:
Foreword Dr. Kenneth Werrell’s hi
- Page 16 and 17:
About the Author Dr. Kenneth P. Wer
- Page 18 and 19:
PREFACE excluded from the original
- Page 20 and 21:
PREFACE always been a factor in air
- Page 22 and 23:
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Artillery Institute
- Page 24 and 25:
ANTIAIRCRAFT DEFENSE THROUGH WORLD
- Page 26 and 27:
ANTIAIRCRAFT DEFENSE THROUGH WORLD
- Page 28 and 29:
ANTIAIRCRAFT DEFENSE THROUGH WORLD
- Page 30 and 31:
ANTIAIRCRAFT DEFENSE THROUGH WORLD
- Page 32 and 33:
ANTIAIRCRAFT DEFENSE THROUGH WORLD
- Page 34 and 35:
Figure 7. British 40 mm light antia
- Page 36 and 37:
ANTIAIRCRAFT DEFENSE THROUGH WORLD
- Page 38 and 39:
ANTIAIRCRAFT DEFENSE THROUGH WORLD
- Page 40 and 41:
ANTIAIRCRAFT DEFENSE THROUGH WORLD
- Page 42 and 43:
ANTIAIRCRAFT DEFENSE THROUGH WORLD
- Page 44 and 45:
ANTIAIRCRAFT DEFENSE THROUGH WORLD
- Page 46 and 47:
ANTIAIRCRAFT DEFENSE THROUGH WORLD
- Page 48 and 49:
ANTIAIRCRAFT DEFENSE THROUGH WORLD
- Page 50 and 51:
ANTIAIRCRAFT DEFENSE THROUGH WORLD
- Page 52 and 53:
ANTIAIRCRAFT DEFENSE THROUGH WORLD
- Page 54 and 55:
ANTIAIRCRAFT DEFENSE THROUGH WORLD
- Page 56 and 57:
ANTIAIRCRAFT DEFENSE THROUGH WORLD
- Page 58 and 59:
ANTIAIRCRAFT DEFENSE THROUGH WORLD
- Page 60 and 61:
ANTIAIRCRAFT DEFENSE THROUGH WORLD
- Page 62 and 63:
ANTIAIRCRAFT DEFENSE THROUGH WORLD
- Page 64 and 65:
ANTIAIRCRAFT DEFENSE THROUGH WORLD
- Page 66 and 67:
ANTIAIRCRAFT DEFENSE THROUGH WORLD
- Page 68 and 69:
ANTIAIRCRAFT DEFENSE THROUGH WORLD
- Page 70 and 71:
ANTIAIRCRAFT DEFENSE THROUGH WORLD
- Page 72 and 73:
ANTIAIRCRAFT DEFENSE THROUGH WORLD
- Page 74 and 75:
ANTIAIRCRAFT DEFENSE THROUGH WORLD
- Page 76 and 77:
ANTIAIRCRAFT DEFENSE THROUGH WORLD
- Page 78 and 79:
ANTIAIRCRAFT DEFENSE THROUGH WORLD
- Page 80 and 81:
ANTIAIRCRAFT DEFENSE THROUGH WORLD
- Page 82 and 83:
ANTIAIRCRAFT DEFENSE THROUGH WORLD
- Page 84 and 85:
ANTIAIRCRAFT DEFENSE THROUGH WORLD
- Page 86 and 87:
ANTIAIRCRAFT DEFENSE THROUGH WORLD
- Page 88 and 89:
ANTIAIRCRAFT DEFENSE THROUGH WORLD
- Page 90 and 91:
ANTIAIRCRAFT DEFENSE THROUGH WORLD
- Page 92 and 93:
FROM GUNS TO MISSILES American air
- Page 94 and 95:
FROM GUNS TO MISSILES company deliv
- Page 96 and 97:
FROM GUNS TO MISSILES (discussed la
- Page 98 and 99:
FROM GUNS TO MISSILES flak rockets
- Page 100 and 101:
FROM GUNS TO MISSILES 1953, the rat
- Page 102 and 103:
FROM GUNS TO MISSILES to 1,285 in J
- Page 104 and 105:
FROM GUNS TO MISSILES Figure 40. Ar
- Page 106 and 107:
FROM GUNS TO MISSILES cember 1958,
- Page 108 and 109:
Figure 42. Nike Hercules. The Nike
- Page 110 and 111:
FROM GUNS TO MISSILES Airmen test-f
- Page 112 and 113:
FROM GUNS TO MISSILES Bomarc failed
- Page 114 and 115:
FROM GUNS TO MISSILES Despite knowl
- Page 116 and 117:
FROM GUNS TO MISSILES Figure 47. Ha
- Page 118 and 119:
FROM GUNS TO MISSILES Army decided
- Page 120 and 121:
FROM GUNS TO MISSILES The third fam
- Page 122 and 123:
FROM GUNS TO MISSILES with both les
- Page 124 and 125:
FROM GUNS TO MISSILES that fired ov
- Page 126 and 127:
FROM GUNS TO MISSILES Figure 53. Br
- Page 128 and 129:
FROM GUNS TO MISSILES The two-decad
- Page 130 and 131:
FROM GUNS TO MISSILES A. H. Peterso
- Page 132 and 133:
FROM GUNS TO MISSILES “SAMs Spur
- Page 134 and 135:
Chapter 3 Airmen versus Guerrillas:
- Page 136 and 137:
AIRMEN VERSUS GUERRILLAS the next y
- Page 138 and 139:
AIRMEN VERSUS GUERRILLAS war with t
- Page 140 and 141:
AIRMEN VERSUS GUERRILLAS Figure 56.
- Page 142 and 143:
AIRMEN VERSUS GUERRILLAS firings fr
- Page 144 and 145:
AIRMEN VERSUS GUERRILLAS Figure 59.
- Page 146 and 147:
AIRMEN VERSUS GUERRILLAS and Navy c
- Page 148 and 149:
AIRMEN VERSUS GUERRILLAS American A
- Page 150 and 151:
AIRMEN VERSUS GUERRILLAS Figure 62.
- Page 152 and 153:
AIRMEN VERSUS GUERRILLAS Figure 63.
- Page 154 and 155:
AIRMEN VERSUS GUERRILLAS but modifi
- Page 156 and 157:
AIRMEN VERSUS GUERRILLAS In all, du
- Page 158 and 159:
AIRMEN VERSUS GUERRILLAS least an e
- Page 160 and 161:
AIRMEN VERSUS GUERRILLAS Figure 66.
- Page 162 and 163:
AIRMEN VERSUS GUERRILLAS War Vietna
- Page 164 and 165:
AIRMEN VERSUS GUERRILLAS D.C.: Depa
- Page 166 and 167:
AIRMEN VERSUS GUERRILLAS 97, 121; a
- Page 168 and 169:
Chapter 4 Operations between Vietna
- Page 170 and 171:
OPERATIONS BETWEEN VIETNAM AND THE
- Page 172 and 173:
OPERATIONS BETWEEN VIETNAM AND THE
- Page 174 and 175:
OPERATIONS BETWEEN VIETNAM AND THE
- Page 176 and 177:
OPERATIONS BETWEEN VIETNAM AND THE
- Page 178 and 179:
OPERATIONS BETWEEN VIETNAM AND THE
- Page 180 and 181: OPERATIONS BETWEEN VIETNAM AND THE
- Page 182 and 183: OPERATIONS BETWEEN VIETNAM AND THE
- Page 184 and 185: OPERATIONS BETWEEN VIETNAM AND THE
- Page 186 and 187: OPERATIONS BETWEEN VIETNAM AND THE
- Page 188 and 189: OPERATIONS BETWEEN VIETNAM AND THE
- Page 190 and 191: OPERATIONS BETWEEN VIETNAM AND THE
- Page 192 and 193: OPERATIONS BETWEEN VIETNAM AND THE
- Page 194 and 195: OPERATIONS BETWEEN VIETNAM AND THE
- Page 196 and 197: OPERATIONS BETWEEN VIETNAM AND THE
- Page 198 and 199: OPERATIONS BETWEEN VIETNAM AND THE
- Page 200 and 201: OPERATIONS BETWEEN VIETNAM AND THE
- Page 202 and 203: Chapter 5 Ballistic Missile Defense
- Page 204 and 205: BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE Army cons
- Page 206 and 207: BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE Figure 80
- Page 208 and 209: Figure 81. Spartan launch. The Spar
- Page 210 and 211: BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE a limited
- Page 212 and 213: BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE these wer
- Page 214 and 215: BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE ment to c
- Page 216 and 217: BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE developin
- Page 218 and 219: BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE Radar Int
- Page 220 and 221: BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE when the
- Page 222 and 223: BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE casualtie
- Page 224 and 225: BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE fluential
- Page 226 and 227: BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE missiles
- Page 228 and 229: BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE psycholog
- Page 232 and 233: BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE April 196
- Page 234 and 235: BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE 54. Reiss
- Page 236 and 237: BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE 74. GWAPS
- Page 238 and 239: Chapter 6 Ground-Based Air Defense
- Page 240 and 241: GROUND-BASED AIR DEFENSE SINCE 1990
- Page 242 and 243: GROUND-BASED AIR DEFENSE SINCE 1990
- Page 244 and 245: GROUND-BASED AIR DEFENSE SINCE 1990
- Page 246 and 247: GROUND-BASED AIR DEFENSE SINCE 1990
- Page 248 and 249: GROUND-BASED AIR DEFENSE SINCE 1990
- Page 250 and 251: GROUND-BASED AIR DEFENSE SINCE 1990
- Page 252 and 253: GROUND-BASED AIR DEFENSE SINCE 1990
- Page 254 and 255: GROUND-BASED AIR DEFENSE SINCE 1990
- Page 256 and 257: GROUND-BASED AIR DEFENSE SINCE 1990
- Page 258 and 259: Chapter 7 Ballistic Missile Defense
- Page 260 and 261: BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE IN THE 19
- Page 262 and 263: BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE IN THE 19
- Page 264 and 265: Figure 96. Arrow launch.The Arrow i
- Page 266 and 267: BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE IN THE 19
- Page 268 and 269: BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE IN THE 19
- Page 270 and 271: BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE IN THE 19
- Page 272 and 273: BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE IN THE 19
- Page 274 and 275: BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE IN THE 19
- Page 276 and 277: BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE IN THE 19
- Page 278 and 279: BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE IN THE 19
- Page 280 and 281:
BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE IN THE 19
- Page 282 and 283:
BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE IN THE 19
- Page 284 and 285:
BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE IN THE 19
- Page 286 and 287:
BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE IN THE 19
- Page 288 and 289:
BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE IN THE 19
- Page 290 and 291:
Chapter 8 Summary, Trends, and Conc
- Page 292 and 293:
SUMMARY, TRENDS, AND CONCLUSIONS ev
- Page 294 and 295:
SUMMARY, TRENDS, AND CONCLUSIONS te
- Page 296 and 297:
SUMMARY, TRENDS, AND CONCLUSIONS EC
- Page 298 and 299:
Index A-1, 128, 227-28, 232 A-4, 12
- Page 300 and 301:
INDEX Convair, 98 Crotale, 158 D-da
- Page 302 and 303:
INDEX Gulf of Tonkin incident, 115
- Page 304 and 305:
INDEX Remagen, 24, 57, 270 RF-4C, 1
- Page 306 and 307:
INDEX SAM, 34, 74, 81-82, 84, 87, 9
- Page 308:
Archie to SAM A Short Operational H