14.07.2014 Views

Archie to SAM: A Short Operational History of Ground-Based Air ...

Archie to SAM: A Short Operational History of Ground-Based Air ...

Archie to SAM: A Short Operational History of Ground-Based Air ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

GROUND-BASED AIR DEFENSE SINCE 1990<br />

The coalition shooting war began with an effort <strong>to</strong> blind the<br />

Iraqi air defense system. Task Force Normandy, nine Army<br />

AH-64 Apache helicopters led by three <strong>Air</strong> Force helicopters,<br />

attacked two early warning radars 21 minutes before the main<br />

assault (H-hour). (This, in fact, may have alerted the defenders.)<br />

<strong>Short</strong>ly after the initial assault, cruise missiles launched from<br />

B-52s and Navy ships and laser-guided bombs dropped from<br />

F-117s slammed in<strong>to</strong> crucial targets. The stealth bombers and<br />

cruise missiles and the suddenness, accuracy, and fury <strong>of</strong> the<br />

assault caught the Iraqis by surprise. The coalition had lulled<br />

the Iraqi defenders during the prewar buildup by repeatedly<br />

flying a standard set <strong>of</strong> flights along the border. Forty minutes<br />

after H-hour, massive numbers <strong>of</strong> coalition aircraft supported<br />

by drones and defense suppression aircraft hit the Iraqis. 15<br />

Within hours, the coalition had achieved air superiority, if not<br />

air supremacy. Or, <strong>to</strong> put it a bit more elegantly, “The initial<br />

strike delivered a paralyzing blow from which Iraq never recovered.”<br />

16 Now the <strong>Air</strong>men could pick the helpless Iraqis<br />

apart at their leisure.<br />

The <strong>Air</strong>men used a variety <strong>of</strong> technologies and considerable<br />

resources <strong>to</strong> combat the Iraqi air defenses. These were successful<br />

well beyond their most optimistic hopes. In hindsight, it is<br />

easy <strong>to</strong> forget that while there was no doubt as <strong>to</strong> the ultimate<br />

outcome <strong>of</strong> a war with Iraq, there were questions and concerns<br />

about its cost. As one observer wrote after the war: “It was a<br />

war that could not be lost. The only question was the price <strong>to</strong><br />

be paid in winning it.” 17 Gen H. Norman Schwarzkopf writes<br />

that some feared that as many as 75 aircraft would be lost on<br />

the first night. Gen Buster C. Glosson, who would run the air<br />

campaign, thought that 10 <strong>to</strong> 18 aircraft might go down, while<br />

Col John A. Warden III, a major planner, estimated that number<br />

might be 10 <strong>to</strong> 15. The estimates for <strong>to</strong>tal losses were also<br />

varied and considerable. At the high end, one Central Command<br />

(CENTCOM) <strong>of</strong>ficial opined that as many as 10 <strong>to</strong> 15 percent<br />

<strong>of</strong> the attackers would be lost. Another estimate out <strong>of</strong> that<br />

headquarters was that the coalition’s aircraft losses could be<br />

as high as 114 <strong>to</strong> 141 in the first three phases <strong>of</strong> the war, with<br />

additional losses in the ground phase. Gen Merrill M. McPeak,<br />

<strong>Air</strong> Force chief <strong>of</strong> staff, would not accept one estimate <strong>of</strong> 0.5<br />

222

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!