Archie to SAM: A Short Operational History of Ground-Based Air ...
Archie to SAM: A Short Operational History of Ground-Based Air ...
Archie to SAM: A Short Operational History of Ground-Based Air ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
GROUND-BASED AIR DEFENSE SINCE 1990<br />
The coalition shooting war began with an effort <strong>to</strong> blind the<br />
Iraqi air defense system. Task Force Normandy, nine Army<br />
AH-64 Apache helicopters led by three <strong>Air</strong> Force helicopters,<br />
attacked two early warning radars 21 minutes before the main<br />
assault (H-hour). (This, in fact, may have alerted the defenders.)<br />
<strong>Short</strong>ly after the initial assault, cruise missiles launched from<br />
B-52s and Navy ships and laser-guided bombs dropped from<br />
F-117s slammed in<strong>to</strong> crucial targets. The stealth bombers and<br />
cruise missiles and the suddenness, accuracy, and fury <strong>of</strong> the<br />
assault caught the Iraqis by surprise. The coalition had lulled<br />
the Iraqi defenders during the prewar buildup by repeatedly<br />
flying a standard set <strong>of</strong> flights along the border. Forty minutes<br />
after H-hour, massive numbers <strong>of</strong> coalition aircraft supported<br />
by drones and defense suppression aircraft hit the Iraqis. 15<br />
Within hours, the coalition had achieved air superiority, if not<br />
air supremacy. Or, <strong>to</strong> put it a bit more elegantly, “The initial<br />
strike delivered a paralyzing blow from which Iraq never recovered.”<br />
16 Now the <strong>Air</strong>men could pick the helpless Iraqis<br />
apart at their leisure.<br />
The <strong>Air</strong>men used a variety <strong>of</strong> technologies and considerable<br />
resources <strong>to</strong> combat the Iraqi air defenses. These were successful<br />
well beyond their most optimistic hopes. In hindsight, it is<br />
easy <strong>to</strong> forget that while there was no doubt as <strong>to</strong> the ultimate<br />
outcome <strong>of</strong> a war with Iraq, there were questions and concerns<br />
about its cost. As one observer wrote after the war: “It was a<br />
war that could not be lost. The only question was the price <strong>to</strong><br />
be paid in winning it.” 17 Gen H. Norman Schwarzkopf writes<br />
that some feared that as many as 75 aircraft would be lost on<br />
the first night. Gen Buster C. Glosson, who would run the air<br />
campaign, thought that 10 <strong>to</strong> 18 aircraft might go down, while<br />
Col John A. Warden III, a major planner, estimated that number<br />
might be 10 <strong>to</strong> 15. The estimates for <strong>to</strong>tal losses were also<br />
varied and considerable. At the high end, one Central Command<br />
(CENTCOM) <strong>of</strong>ficial opined that as many as 10 <strong>to</strong> 15 percent<br />
<strong>of</strong> the attackers would be lost. Another estimate out <strong>of</strong> that<br />
headquarters was that the coalition’s aircraft losses could be<br />
as high as 114 <strong>to</strong> 141 in the first three phases <strong>of</strong> the war, with<br />
additional losses in the ground phase. Gen Merrill M. McPeak,<br />
<strong>Air</strong> Force chief <strong>of</strong> staff, would not accept one estimate <strong>of</strong> 0.5<br />
222