14.07.2014 Views

Archie to SAM: A Short Operational History of Ground-Based Air ...

Archie to SAM: A Short Operational History of Ground-Based Air ...

Archie to SAM: A Short Operational History of Ground-Based Air ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

OPERATIONS BETWEEN VIETNAM AND THE PERSIAN GULF<br />

even with small numbers <strong>of</strong> aircraft and <strong>SAM</strong>s, imposed heavy<br />

losses on these aircraft and aircrews. But the Argentines did<br />

penetrate the defenses, did inflict much damage on the more<br />

costly British fleet, and came close <strong>to</strong> repulsing the British<br />

counterinvasion. Nevertheless, the British won the war.<br />

Immediately after the invasion <strong>of</strong> Afghanistan, the Soviets<br />

made good use <strong>of</strong> air power in support <strong>of</strong> ground operations<br />

against the guerrillas. Initially, limited rebel antiaircraft protection<br />

could not disrupt this air support; but, the introduction<br />

<strong>of</strong> more modern and lethal man-portable <strong>SAM</strong>s did. These<br />

missiles not only inflicted substantial losses on Soviet aircraft,<br />

they forced the <strong>Air</strong>men <strong>to</strong> use less-effective tactics and eroded<br />

the morale <strong>of</strong> the Afghan pilots. In brief, these weapons neutralized<br />

air power, which, in turn, turned the tide on the ground.<br />

In short order, the Soviets withdrew in defeat.<br />

If these wars demonstrated anything, they showed the potential<br />

<strong>of</strong> high technology. At the same time, they indicated that<br />

numbers and weapons handling are extremely important <strong>to</strong> the<br />

final outcome. High-technology weapons demand high-quality<br />

personnel.<br />

Notes<br />

1. Vic<strong>to</strong>r Flintham, <strong>Air</strong> Wars and <strong>Air</strong>craft: A Detailed Record <strong>of</strong> <strong>Air</strong> Combat,<br />

1945 <strong>to</strong> the Present (New York: Facts on File Yearbook, Inc., 1990), 46;<br />

Moshe Dayan, Diary <strong>of</strong> the Sinai Campaign (New York: Schocken Books, Inc.,<br />

1965), 177–78, 221; Chaim Herzog, The Arab-Israeli Wars: War and Peace in<br />

the Middle East (New York: Random House, 1982), 145; Trevor Dupuy, Elusive<br />

Vic<strong>to</strong>ry: The Arab-Israeli Wars, 1947–1974 (New York: Harper and Row,<br />

1978), 212; and Stephen Peltz, “Israeli <strong>Air</strong> Power,” Flying Review International,<br />

December 1967, 1019.<br />

2. Edward N. Luttwak and Daniel Horowitz, The Israeli Army (New York:<br />

Harper and Row, 1975), 229–30; Nadav Safran, From War <strong>to</strong> War—The Arab-<br />

Israeli Confrontation, 1948–1967 (Indianapolis, Ind.: Bobbs-Merrill Co., Inc.,<br />

1969), 324–25; Murray Rubenstein and Richard Goldman, Shield <strong>of</strong> David<br />

(Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, Inc., 1978), 100; Robert Jackson, The<br />

Israeli <strong>Air</strong> Force S<strong>to</strong>ry (London: Stacey, 1970), 218; Warren Wetmore, “Israeli<br />

<strong>Air</strong> Punch Major Fac<strong>to</strong>r in War,” Aviation Week, 3 July 1967, 22; and Edgar<br />

O’ Ballance, The Third Arab-Israeli War (Hamden, Conn.: Archon Books, 1972),<br />

67, 75, 82.<br />

3. Jackson, The Israeli <strong>Air</strong> Force, 153, 248; Wetmore, “Israeli <strong>Air</strong> Punch,”<br />

2; James Hansen, “The Development <strong>of</strong> Soviet Tactical <strong>Air</strong> Defense,” Inter-<br />

174

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!