Procedure for the procurement of consulting service - DOH
Procedure for the procurement of consulting service - DOH
Procedure for the procurement of consulting service - DOH
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>DOH</strong> CUSTOMIZED PROCUREMENT MANUAL VOLUME 4 2010<br />
WHEREAS, <strong>the</strong> TWG noted <strong>the</strong> following comments in <strong>the</strong> financial proposals <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> two (2) firms, to<br />
wit:<br />
A. Company A<br />
1. There is a subsistence allowance <strong>of</strong> PhP 4,347.83, and at <strong>the</strong> same time accommodation <strong>of</strong> PhP<br />
4,347.83 <strong>for</strong> Cebu and PhP 1,737.13 <strong>for</strong> Davao.<br />
2. Clarify whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> subsistence allowance is not part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> accommodation.<br />
3. There is no breakdown <strong>of</strong> expenses on <strong>the</strong> launch event amounting to PhP 521,739.13.<br />
4. It was noted that 15% EVAT is included in <strong>the</strong> summary <strong>of</strong> costs. EVAT should only be 12% <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> cost which is estimated to be PhP 941,175.65.<br />
B. Company B<br />
1. It was noted that <strong>the</strong> local taxes included in <strong>the</strong> proposal amounts to PhP 1,336,327.97.<br />
2. The 12% EVAT that should be added to <strong>the</strong> cost is estimated to be PhP 869,156.40 only.<br />
WHEREAS, upon consolidation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> respective combined technical and financial scores <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> two (2)<br />
bidders, Company B, Inc. obtained <strong>the</strong> higher combined technical and financial score <strong>of</strong> 89.76% as shown<br />
below:<br />
Firm Technical Score and Weight Financial Score and Weight Total<br />
Score (%)<br />
Average<br />
Score (%)<br />
Weight<br />
(70%)<br />
Weighted<br />
Score (%)<br />
Average<br />
Score (%)<br />
Weight<br />
(30%)<br />
Weighted<br />
Score (%)<br />
A 72.4 0.6 43.44 100 0.4 40.00 83.44<br />
B 86.2 0.6 51.72 95.11 0.4 38.04 89.76<br />
WHEREAS, <strong>the</strong> TWG recommended clarifying <strong>the</strong> following with Company B during contract<br />
negotiation being <strong>the</strong> Highest Rated Bid (HRB), to wit:<br />
1. The source <strong>of</strong> breakdown <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> creative materials during <strong>the</strong> branding activity is<br />
not included in <strong>the</strong> proposal.<br />
2. Clarify on what <strong>the</strong> agency means by “Local transportation costs are not included if being made<br />
available by <strong>the</strong> entity. Similarly, in <strong>the</strong> project site, <strong>of</strong>fice rent/accommodation/clerical assistance<br />
costs are not to be included if being made by <strong>the</strong> entity.”<br />
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> above premises, <strong>the</strong> herein members <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> BAC HEREBY<br />
RESOLVE <strong>the</strong> following:<br />
1. Recommend <strong>the</strong> approval <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> results <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> combined technical and financial evaluation;<br />
2. Notify Company A and Company B about <strong>the</strong> result <strong>of</strong> bid evaluation;<br />
3. Request Company B to submit <strong>the</strong> additional required documents <strong>for</strong> post-qualification;<br />
253