Procedure for the procurement of consulting service - DOH

MANUAL PROCEDURES FOR THE PROCUREMENT OF CONSULTING SERVICES
Firm
Example:
Ave.
Score
Technical Proposal
Weight
Weighted
Score
Ave.
Score
Financial Proposal
Weight
Weighted
Score
Total
Score
A 86.0 X 70% or 0.7 = 60.2 90.9 X 30% or 0.3 = 27.3 87.5
B 84.2 X 70% or 0.7 = 58.9 100 X 30% or 0.3 = 30.0 88.9
C 85.0 X 70% or 0.7 = 59.5 66.7 X 30% or 0.3 = 20.0 79.5
D 80.4 X 70% or 0.7 = 56.4 76.9 X 30% or 0.3 = 23.1 79.4
E 83.0 X 70% or 0.7 = 58.1 83 X 30% or 0.3 = 24.9 83.0
iv.
The BAC ranks the consultants in descending order, with the consultant
obtaining the highest total score being declared as the bidder with the
HRB.
v. The BAC submits the results of its evaluation to the HOPE, identifying the
consultant with the HRB, and recommending that consultant with the HRB
be authorized to negotiate with this consultant.
vi.
The HOPE shall approve or disapprove the recommendations of the BAC
within two (2) calendar days after receipt of the results of the evaluation
from the BAC.
vii. After approval by the HOPE of the HRB, the BAC shall, within three (3)
calendar days, notify and invite the consultant with the HRB for
negotiation in accordance with Section 33.2.5 of the revised IRR, except
for item (e) thereof (Section 33.2.1 of the revised IRR).
QBE considers only the Technical Proposals in the ranking of consultants. QCBE,
on the other hand, considers both the Technical and Financial Proposals in the
ranking of consultants. The former must be applied for:
a. Complex or highly specialized assignments for which it is difficult to
precisely define the TOR and the required inputs from the consultants;
and
b. Where the assignment can be carried out in substantially different ways,
such that the proposals are not comparable.
In other cases, the QCBE procedure shall apply.
Whatever evaluation method is applied, bids are rated numerically. This can be
done in either of two ways: individual or collegial rating.
74