09.07.2015 Views

Lekwa Local Municipality 2013/14 - Co-operative Governance and ...

Lekwa Local Municipality 2013/14 - Co-operative Governance and ...

Lekwa Local Municipality 2013/14 - Co-operative Governance and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

(c) The preferred performance model that describes what areas of performance will bemeasured;(d) The process by which the system will be managed;(e) The roles <strong>and</strong> responsibilities of different stakeholders; <strong>and</strong>(f) The process of managing employee performanceFigure 1: The 5 Perspectives of the Municipal Balanced ScorecardFinancialManagementPerspective(Process, Input &Output Indicators)Service DeliveryPerspective(Output & OutcomeIndicators)MunicipalDevelopmentPerspective(Output & OutcomeIndicators)<strong>Governance</strong> ProcessPerspective(Process Indicators)(ProcessInstitutional DevelopmentalPerspective(Process & Input Indicators)6.9 Implementation of the Municipal Balanced Scorecard in <strong>Lekwa</strong> <strong>Local</strong><strong>Municipality</strong>In looking at the Municipal Balanced Scorecard Model, a two-level scorecard approach is proposed. Thestrategic or organisational scorecard will reflect KPAs, objectives, indicators <strong>and</strong> targets at a strategic level <strong>and</strong>will align directly with the IDP priorities. This scorecard will follow along the lines of the SDBIP, but will nothave the monthly financial cash flow projections <strong>and</strong> the ward level projects. The second scorecard will beservice or departmental scorecards <strong>and</strong> this level of scorecards will reflect objectives, indicators <strong>and</strong> targets ata departmental level. This scorecard will also inform the individual scorecards of the section 57 managers.The two levels of scorecards will become the organisational Municipal Balanced Scorecard PerformanceManagement System of <strong>Lekwa</strong> <strong>Local</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong>. All reporting on the municipality’s performance will beinformed by information derived from the two-level scorecard <strong>and</strong> reflect the municipality’s performance onthe five perspectives. In respect of the organisational scorecard, the audience will be the community, <strong>Co</strong>uncil,Executive Mayor <strong>and</strong> Mayoral <strong>Co</strong>mmittee, while the departmental scorecard audience will be the ExecutiveMayor, <strong>Co</strong>uncil <strong>Co</strong>mmittees, Municipal Manager, Heads of Departments <strong>and</strong> Divisional Managers.6.10 <strong>Lekwa</strong> LM <strong>and</strong> Performance Management<strong>Lekwa</strong> <strong>Local</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> has in the past years operated without an adopted performance managementframework <strong>and</strong> has solely relied on the legislated provisions to manage its performance, which has resulted ingaps in adequately dealing with performance management, thus the need for a performance managementframework that will assist to more effectively assess <strong>and</strong> evaluate the overall performance of the <strong>Municipality</strong>.A policy framework has therefore been proposed as a model for performance management in line with currentlegislative <strong>and</strong> policy frameworks. As required by the MSA <strong>and</strong> the Planning <strong>and</strong> Performance Regulations2001, this policy framework sets out the following:211 | P a g e

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!