10.07.2015 Views

Effects of dietary n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and ... - FINS

Effects of dietary n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and ... - FINS

Effects of dietary n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and ... - FINS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1 st WorkshopXIII International Feed Technology SymposiumALTERNATIVE POSSIBILITY TO SUBSTITUTE MAIZEWITH SUDAN GRASS FOR PREPARING SILAGE FORDAIRY COWSGoran Stoparić 1 , Nurgin Memiši 1 , Jovanka Lević 2 , Zorica Tomić 31 AD Mlekara – Subotica, Tolminska 10, Serbia2 Institute for Food Technology, Bulevar cara Lazara 1, Novi Sad, Serbia3 Institute <strong>of</strong> Animal Husb<strong>and</strong>ry, Zemun, SerbiaABSTRACTUnder our conditions, there are numerous factors that can considerably reduce maizeyield. The most important factor is certainly drought, which frequently appearsduring maize vegetation. In addition to adequate implementation <strong>of</strong> requiredagritechnical measures, one <strong>of</strong> the ways to alleviate consequences <strong>of</strong> draught, onterrains not adequate for irrigation, is also the introduction <strong>of</strong> cultures more resistantto draught than the present most frequent cultures. One such culture is sudan grass.This paper makes an attempt to answer the question to what extent growing sudangrass can replace growing maize for producing silage for cattle feed.Research was carried out in the region <strong>of</strong> the village <strong>of</strong> Cantavir, where, maize <strong>and</strong>sudan grass silage were prepared in 2003 <strong>and</strong> 2004 for the needs <strong>of</strong> a cattle farm with200 dairy cows. To prepare sudan grass silage, both in 2003 <strong>and</strong> 2004, the strain NSSrem was planted. Results <strong>of</strong> chemical analyses show that whole maize plants arewithout a doubt a better quality feed than sudan grass silage. First, whole maize plantsilage contains considerably less NDF <strong>and</strong> ADF fibers, <strong>and</strong> considerably morenonstructural carbohydrates than sudan grass silage. The result <strong>of</strong> this differentchemical composition <strong>of</strong> analyzed silage is that maize silage is much more digestible<strong>and</strong> richer in energy. In addition, maize silage had higher yield only <strong>of</strong> the easilydigestible fraction, which is by all means the most important, <strong>and</strong> this yield wasalmost 50% higher than for sudan grass. A comparison <strong>of</strong> results <strong>of</strong> this researchpermits the conclusion that owing to its ability to regenerate, sudan grass can be usedfreshly cut as green feed, <strong>and</strong> when used in this manner it <strong>of</strong>fers three cuttingsannually without any problems. Sudan grass is resistant to draught <strong>and</strong> has higheryields <strong>of</strong> green mass, however sudan grass silage has lower quality than whole maizeplant silage. For this reason, sudan grass silage should be used exclusively forfeeding those categories <strong>of</strong> cattle that do not require high quantities <strong>of</strong> energy in theration (dry cows, pregnant heifers, growing heifers, <strong>and</strong> heifers in insemination).Key words: maize, sudan grass, ADF, NDFINTRODUCTIONIt is a known fact that agricultural production <strong>and</strong> production <strong>of</strong> animal feed as itsintegral part, are facing numerous problems, very <strong>of</strong>ten coinciding in time <strong>and</strong> space.Very frequently, the solving <strong>of</strong> one problem can result in another problem, <strong>and</strong> for253

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!