10.07.2015 Views

Effects of dietary n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and ... - FINS

Effects of dietary n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and ... - FINS

Effects of dietary n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and ... - FINS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1 st WorkshopXIII International Feed Technology Symposiummin (L * 45', a * 45', b * 45') <strong>and</strong> 24 h post mortem (L * 24h, a * 24h, b * 24h). Water holding capacity(WHC 24h ) was determined by compression method <strong>and</strong> expressed as % <strong>of</strong> bound water[5].From samples <strong>of</strong> SM external fat <strong>and</strong> connective tissue were removed <strong>and</strong> meat washomogenized <strong>and</strong> kept in polyethylene bags at temperature <strong>of</strong> -18°C until determination<strong>of</strong> the basic chemical composition.Nutritional quality <strong>of</strong> meat was investigated determining: content <strong>of</strong> moisture [8], totalash [9], free fat [6], proteins [7] <strong>and</strong> the content <strong>of</strong> total pigments, as parameters <strong>of</strong>colour using Möhler's modification method.All data are presented as st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation. The results were evaluated statisticallyusing the analysis <strong>of</strong> variance <strong>and</strong> Duncan's multiple range test in the Statistical AnalysisSystem [19].RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONThe results presented in Table 1 shows that the average yield <strong>of</strong> meat in carcass <strong>of</strong> pigsranges from 48.71% (K) to 51.77% (O 2 ). Using the method <strong>of</strong> two points numericallybut not significantly higher (P>0.05) meat yield in carcass <strong>of</strong> pigs fed with the addition<strong>of</strong> adsorbent mycotoxins was determined, comparing to the value found in carcass <strong>of</strong>pigs in the control group.Carcass <strong>of</strong> pigs from experimental groups O 1 <strong>and</strong> O 2 belong to the quality class E, whilecarcass <strong>of</strong> control (K) <strong>and</strong> experimental group O 3 belong to the class U, based on thecalculated percentage <strong>of</strong> meat yield (Table 1).Table 1. Average values <strong>of</strong> LF, RF <strong>and</strong> meat yield in carcass <strong>of</strong> pigs from control <strong>and</strong>experimental groupsParameters LF (mm) RF (mm) Meat yield (%) ClassK 29.90 ns ± 5.20 23.50 ns ± 5.15 48.71 ns ± 3.24 UO 125.10 ns ± 7.96 20.10 ns ± 6.76 51.61 ns ± 4.71 EO 225.20 ns ± 3.55 18.60 ns ± 2.50 51.77 ns ± 1.92 EO 329.70 ns ± 3.83 23.10 ns ±6.31 48.87 ns ± 2.54 Unsindicates not significant difference at P > 0.05Average values <strong>of</strong> T i (Table 2) <strong>of</strong> all examined groups <strong>of</strong> pigs carcasses exceed themaximum allowable temperature, i.e. all T i values were higher than 40°C, what indicatesthat all four groups <strong>of</strong> pigs were under stress when exsanguinated, <strong>and</strong> that animals werenot properly prepared for slaughter, <strong>and</strong> that welfare <strong>of</strong> animals was not observed [15].Results <strong>of</strong> T 24h indicates that main dem<strong>and</strong> in means <strong>of</strong> hygienic quality <strong>of</strong> processedmeat <strong>of</strong> experimental O 3 <strong>and</strong> control K groups were not satisfied, while this dem<strong>and</strong> weresatisfied at experimental O 1 <strong>and</strong> O 2 groups, because average values <strong>of</strong> T 24h in deep leg <strong>of</strong>this groups were lower than 4°C [15]. Determined pH 45' values were higher than 5.8 inSM <strong>of</strong> all examined groups. The highest pH 45' value was for control group (K), withstatistically significant differences with O 1, O 2 (P

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!