10.07.2015 Views

Effects of dietary n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and ... - FINS

Effects of dietary n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and ... - FINS

Effects of dietary n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and ... - FINS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1 st WorkshopXIII International Feed Technology SymposiumTrans isomers <strong>of</strong> 18:1:Analysis <strong>of</strong> the different isomers <strong>of</strong> trans 18:1 (from beef total trans 18:1 purified bypreparative HPLC) by gas-liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (GLC-MS) clearlyshowed that with a basal diet rich in cereals, lipid supplements can diversely modifiedthe health value <strong>of</strong> beef trans 18:1 on the basis <strong>of</strong> the Δ9tr <strong>and</strong> Δ10tr (detrimental) <strong>and</strong>Δ11tr 18:1 (beneficial) (Table 3). They had a positive effect when 18:3n-3 was mainlyprovided (diet L) or a rather negative effect when 18:3n-3 was associated to 18:1n-9(diet RL) (Bispo et al., 2009).Table 3. <strong>Effects</strong> <strong>of</strong> lipid supplements (L= linseed; R = rapeseed) on the distribution <strong>of</strong>trans 18:1 (in % total trans 18:1, mean ± SD) in lipids <strong>of</strong> bovine LT muscledetermined by GLC-MS (*, P< 0.05) (from Bispo et al., 2009).Trans18:1Diet CDiet LDiet RL6tr 7tr 8tr 9tr 10tr 11tr 12tr 13tr 14tr 15tr 16tr1.3±0.90.6±0.50.5±0.40.5±0.10.4±0.10.6±0.11.9±0.31.6±0.42.3±0.68.5±1.55.0*±0.86.4*±0.933.7±18.615.6*±6.741.1±16.436.1±14.433.2±11.825.0*±12.44.3±1.26.1*±0.34.9±9.23.4±1.08.7*±0.85.8±1.84.0±1.39.1*±0.95.5±1.63.4±1.810.9*±9.05.0±1.82.9±1.98.9*±2.73.1±1.1EFFECTS OF DIETARY AND PHYSIOLOGICAL FACTORS ONPLASMA AND BEEF LIPOPEROXIDATIONBeef having improved nutritional qualities (higher content <strong>of</strong> n-3 PUFA associated to abetter protection <strong>of</strong> PUFA by antioxidants) by breeding factors are marketed with a highadded value such as the French Label Rouge procedure. In this context, it is necessary toprecise the impact <strong>of</strong> specific meat technological treatments to preserve their qualitiesuntil the sale <strong>of</strong> products. Indeed, technological treatments as storage <strong>and</strong> processingmay favour peroxidation processes <strong>and</strong> lipolysis which entail negative consequences onnutritional <strong>and</strong> sensorial qualities (Min <strong>and</strong> Ahn, 2005). In this context, PUFA <strong>of</strong>phospholipids are the primary substrates <strong>of</strong> lipid oxidation in muscle foods whereastriacylglycerols would play a minor role. Incorporation <strong>of</strong> PUFA (from seeds or freshgrass) into bovine muscle lipids did not activate muscle antioxidant enzymes, theprotection against the peroxidation process being strictly dependent on the amount <strong>of</strong><strong>dietary</strong> antioxidant molecules stored in muscle cells (Dur<strong>and</strong> et al., 2005).The effects <strong>of</strong> technological treatments on beef lipoperoxidation stability were studiedon PUFA rich beef varying in their antioxidant content (from cows given the L, LE orRLEP diet). The impact <strong>of</strong> beef ageing <strong>and</strong> packaging treatments were more especiallyanalyzed.5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!