Back-up not in agenda book - Seminole County Schools

targeted by the proposed project possess proportionately lower percentages of F/R lunch (lowincome)students enrolled in advanced placement courses than these students’ peer group of non-F/R students.% F/RStudents% Non-F/RStudentsTable 4: Enrollment in AP Courses by F/R Lunch StatusCrooms AOIT Lyman High Seminole HighMath Science English Math Science English Math Science English1.5 4.8 8.1 1.5 4.2 6.2 1.9 5.1 8.95.1 14.6 13.0 3.2 11.7 16.9 5.2 11.9 24.7Further, the data demonstrates that the percentage of students in the sub-groups of black andHispanic in the category of F/R lunch status are less likely to enroll in advanced placementcourses in math and science.Table 5: Enrollment of F/R Lunch Students in AP Courses by SubgroupCrooms AOIT Lyman High Seminole HighMath Science English Math Science English Math Science EnglishWhite - Males 1.9 5.7 5.7 2.1 6.4 6.9 2.4 7.2 9.0White –Females4.0 4.0 20.0 2.4 4.8 12.8 2.1 6.4 14.4Black – Males 0.0 3.3 6.7 0.9 0.0 0.9 0.4 5.7 3.7Black –Females0.0 3.8 1.9 0.0 0.0 4.0 2.8 2.8 9.9Hispanic –Males1.7 1.7 5.1 1.7 5.1 4.6 1.8 3.0 4.8Hispanic –Females0.0 7.1 21.4 0.7 4.9 7.0 1.0 2.5 7.4While enrollment of students in advanced placement courses is vital, success on the advancedplacement exam provides students the opportunity to enter post-secondary education with creditstowards college graduation. A review of the data in Table 6 and Table 7 on low-incomestudents’ success rates (defined as scoring a 3+) indicates low performance rates. Alarmingly,successful performance of subgroups – specifically in math and science – is virtually nonexistent.Project Narrative Page 5 of 28Page 9