29.11.2012 Views

Oral and Poster Abstracts

Oral and Poster Abstracts

Oral and Poster Abstracts

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Israeli commercial dairy herds consisting of 251-824 high producing<br />

Israeli Holsteins. Data were collected between March 2006 <strong>and</strong> August<br />

2007 <strong>and</strong> included health, production, reproduction <strong>and</strong> management data<br />

<strong>and</strong> over 250,000 daily BW measurements from 2,167 cows. Time series<br />

analysis was performed whereby each series of BW measurements was<br />

represented as the sum of a trend component, periodic component <strong>and</strong><br />

"white noise". In order to construct "st<strong>and</strong>ard" relative BW curves,<br />

estimates from mixed models fit to the data were obtained. Seven day <strong>and</strong><br />

21 day cycles in BW were present in 247 (11.4%) <strong>and</strong> 715 (33.0%) of the<br />

cows, respectively. Presence of 21 day cycles was associated with a<br />

reduction of 33% in the risk of being diagnosed with inactive ovaries.<br />

Mean days from calving to nadir BW were 37, 54 <strong>and</strong> 61 for first, second<br />

<strong>and</strong> older parity cows, respectively. Mean loss in BW (kg) from calving to<br />

nadir was 46.5, 68.2 <strong>and</strong> 78.3 for first, second <strong>and</strong> older parity cows,<br />

respectively. The "average" first parity cow lost 6.5% of its calving BW as<br />

opposed to 8.5% in the older cows. Gain in BW following the nadir value<br />

was markedly more rapid in first parity cows. The presence of 21 day<br />

cycles in BW is most probably related to the sexual cycle, as indicated by<br />

the relationship with inactive ovaries. Monitoring the presence of these<br />

cycles could be useful for indirectly assessing ovarian activity in dairy<br />

herds. Compared to older cows, fewer days from calving to nadir BW <strong>and</strong><br />

smaller BW loss from calving to nadir, coupled with a faster post-nadir<br />

increase in relative BW in first parity cows indicate a smaller energy<br />

deficit in early lactation in this group. "St<strong>and</strong>ard" relative BW curves for<br />

the first 120 days in lactation are presented.<br />

102 Use <strong>and</strong> Abuse of a Uterine Scoring System in Clinical<br />

Practice<br />

D. Nielsen, L. Jensen, R. Jespersen, C. Enevoldsen<br />

Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Department of<br />

Large Animal Clinical Sciences, Copenhagen, Denmark<br />

Valid <strong>and</strong> precise clinical metritis diagnoses are crucial for rational<br />

decisions on treatments of individual cows, effective monitoring of the<br />

herd <strong>and</strong> advanced multifactorial epidemiological analyses within <strong>and</strong><br />

between herds. A steadily growing proportion of Danish cattle<br />

veterinarians examine <strong>and</strong> score the uterine status of cows 5-12 days post<br />

partum on an ordinal 0-9 scale. In addition, the veterinarians record<br />

whether they treat the cow for metritis in connection with the scoring.<br />

The objectives of this study were 1) to evaluate the current usage of the<br />

uterine score as a treatment guideline <strong>and</strong> 2) to examine the agreement<br />

between veterinarians on the definition <strong>and</strong> use of the score values. By<br />

means of semi-structured telephone interviews we investigated how 20<br />

cattle veterinarians decided which cow should be treated for metritis. The<br />

telephone interview showed that the veterinarians used the scoring scale<br />

as an integrated part of a wide range of other diagnostic criteria <strong>and</strong><br />

anamnestic information. It was an important finding that the<br />

veterinarians initially gave a concise description of how they used a scale<br />

value as a threshold for treatment. But after more in-depth questioning<br />

80% reconsidered <strong>and</strong> described more complex applications of the scale.<br />

Rectal temperature was seldom used as a treatment criterion. Such<br />

implicit treatment strategies may explain some of the interactions <strong>and</strong><br />

apparent inconsistencies revealed by purely quantitative studies of large<br />

data files with routinely collected data (e.g. the Danish National Cattle<br />

Data Base). Examples will be shown. To elaborate further on the use of<br />

the scoring scale independent observations were made by a trained<br />

practicing veterinarian (>20 years in practice) <strong>and</strong> an untrained (student)<br />

on 45 cows 5-12 days in milk (DIM). The results showed good<br />

agreement (weighted kappa 0.8 [0.72; 0.89]). However, when agreement<br />

between 2 different observers (student <strong>and</strong> first author) on the score<br />

components (odour <strong>and</strong> quantity) were evaluated in 25 cows 5-20 DIM,<br />

poor results were obtained (weighted kappa 0.37 [0.01; 0.74] <strong>and</strong> 0.37<br />

[0.15; 0.59], respectively. Both studies indicate that further<br />

communication about treatment strategies based on uterine scores <strong>and</strong><br />

calibration of the scale are needed to obtain a data quality that allows<br />

valid <strong>and</strong> precise conclusions about the historic development of uterine<br />

status <strong>and</strong> permits multifactorial analysis of the effects of uterine status<br />

<strong>and</strong> metritis treatment.<br />

103 A Government Subsidised Herd Health Pilot Programme:<br />

Four Years Progress (2004 -2008)<br />

P. Mullowney 1 , D. Barrett 1 , R. Fallon 2 , J. Egan 1 , M. Good 1<br />

1<br />

Department of Agriculture, Fisheries <strong>and</strong> Food, Training Section,<br />

6E, Dublin, Irel<strong>and</strong><br />

2<br />

Teagasc, Grange, Co. Meath, Irel<strong>and</strong><br />

152 XXV. Jubilee World Buiatrics Congress 2008<br />

To evaluate the success of a Government Subsidised Herd Health Pilot<br />

Programme established in 2004.<br />

Methods: The Programme commenced in January 2004 with a series<br />

of seminars for participating veterinarians on IBR, BVD, Johne’s<br />

Disease, Epidemiology <strong>and</strong> Risk Analysis. These veterinarians<br />

enrolled 78 of their clients in the scheme. Forty six of these were dairy<br />

herds, 21 suckler <strong>and</strong> 11 mixed enterprise. Sixty one herds took part in<br />

Johne’s control, 18 in BVD control <strong>and</strong> 8 in IBR. Of the 61 Johne’s<br />

herds 39 thought that they were free of the infection <strong>and</strong> wanted to<br />

prevent its entry whilst the remaining 19 knew they had the disease <strong>and</strong><br />

wanted to eliminate it. A fee was paid to participating veterinarians for<br />

a risk analysis in each of the herds <strong>and</strong> testing costs were subsidised in<br />

the laboratory. Follow up seminars were given to the enrolled<br />

herdowners <strong>and</strong> their practitioners in August 2005 <strong>and</strong> December 2007.<br />

The scheme was also subsidised by contributions from farm <strong>and</strong><br />

veterinary organisations including Veterinary Irel<strong>and</strong>, University<br />

College Dublin, Irish Cattle Breeders Federation, Teagasc <strong>and</strong> Irish<br />

Farmers Association. The enrolled herds have been testing for various<br />

lengths of time. Fifty seven herds have taken blood samples, 14 of<br />

which have been negative on all tests <strong>and</strong> 43 having positive samples<br />

on one or more tests. Twenty herds carried out faecal sampling.<br />

Fourteen of these had all negative results, while positive samples were<br />

found in six herds. An annual risk evaluation was carried out in all<br />

herds to ensure that the client had carried out agreed<br />

recommendations. Participants have requested a form of certification<br />

for those herds with all negative results. This would be combined with<br />

an assessment that the herd is closed.<br />

Key words: Johnes, IBR, BVD, herd health<br />

104 A Comparison of Production, Calving <strong>and</strong> Fertility Related<br />

Events in 10 Irish Dairy Herds Located in the Vicinity of a<br />

Chemical Industrial Complex <strong>and</strong> 10 Dairy Herds Located in<br />

Non Industrialised Areas<br />

J. Buckley 1 , P. O'Mahony 1 , J. O'Donovan 2 , D. Berry 3 , K. O'Farrell 4<br />

1<br />

Cork County Council, Veterinary Department, Cork, Irel<strong>and</strong><br />

2<br />

Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Veterinary Department, Dublin,<br />

Irel<strong>and</strong><br />

3<br />

Teagasc, Moorepark, Dairy Production Research Centre, Fermoy,<br />

Irel<strong>and</strong><br />

4<br />

Veterinary Consultant, Dairy Production, Cork, Irel<strong>and</strong><br />

Production, calving <strong>and</strong> fertility data for the years 2001 to 2004 inclusive<br />

was collated for 10 dairy herds located in the vicinity of a complex of<br />

chemical industries in the Cork harbour region (target herds) <strong>and</strong> 10 herds<br />

located in rural, non-industrialised areas (control Herds). Average milk<br />

yield per cow, stocking rates <strong>and</strong> culling rates were similar for the two<br />

groups of herds. The prime reasons for disposal of animals from both<br />

groups of herds were infertility, ”old age”, mastitis, lameness <strong>and</strong> low<br />

production. The proportion of deaths recorded in both groups was similar<br />

(1.8% of total calvings) for the four year period. Overall, the proportion of<br />

male calves born (52%) was significantly greater than females. There was<br />

no significant difference between groups in the sex ratio, the incidence of<br />

calving difficulty or the incidence of retained placentae. A higher<br />

proportion (P

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!