29.11.2012 Views

Oral and Poster Abstracts

Oral and Poster Abstracts

Oral and Poster Abstracts

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

vaccination status (average 1989-2007: 7% for vaccinated animals<br />

versus 12% for unvaccinated animals). The benefit of salmonella<br />

vaccination appeared greater from 1996 onwards. The relative risk of<br />

being S. Dublin culture positive was only 5% for submissions from<br />

vaccinated animals after 1995 compared to 13% for submissions from<br />

unvaccinated animals in the same period.<br />

209 Sero-Epidemiology of Brucellosis in Goats at Rakh Khaire<br />

Wala Farm District Layyah, Pakistan<br />

M. Arshad 1 , M. Munir 1 , Z. Abbas 2<br />

1<br />

University of Agriculture, Department of Microbiology, Faisalabad-<br />

38040,, Pakistan<br />

2<br />

University of Agricuture, Department of Parasitology, Faisalabad,<br />

Pakistan<br />

Introduction: Brucellosis is responsible for considerable economic<br />

losses due to abortion, low milk production <strong>and</strong> infertility in goats. It<br />

also has a zoonotic importance that plays a significant role in the<br />

national economy <strong>and</strong> the public health of many parts of the world<br />

particularly in developing countries. Keeping in view the economic <strong>and</strong><br />

zoonotic importance of this disease, the project had been planned to<br />

study the sero-prevalence of brucellosis in goats at Rakh Khaire Wala<br />

Farm, District Layyah, Pakistan.<br />

Materials And Methods: A total of five hundred (500) serum<br />

samples were collected r<strong>and</strong>omly from goat breeds (Teddy, Pak<br />

239 The Present <strong>and</strong> the Future of IBR Control<br />

P. Franken<br />

Animal Health Service Deventer, Cattle Health Service, Deventer,<br />

Netherl<strong>and</strong>s<br />

The development of a marker vaccine against IBR, has opened the<br />

way for the eradication of IBR also in high prevalence <strong>and</strong> high<br />

density area's. A number of European countries have started or will<br />

start eradication programmes based on the use of this vaccine.<br />

Actually there is a lot of knowledge <strong>and</strong> experience about control<br />

<strong>and</strong> eradication of IBR in different epidemiological situations.An<br />

overview will be given of the present status in Europe <strong>and</strong> the needs<br />

for international trade of animals <strong>and</strong> genetic material will be stated.<br />

Key words: IBR, marker vaccine, control, future<br />

240 Infectious Bovine Rhinotracheitis <strong>and</strong> the Epidemiological<br />

Role of the other Ruminant Species<br />

J. Thiry, B. Muylkens, E. Thiry<br />

University of Liege - Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of<br />

Infectious <strong>and</strong> Parasitic Diseases - Virology <strong>and</strong> Viral Diseases,<br />

Liege, Belgium<br />

See in the Supplement I.<br />

241 Pitfalls in IBR Diagnosis in the Field<br />

M. Beer, P. Koenig<br />

Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Institute of Diagnostic Virology,<br />

Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany<br />

BHV-1 (IBR/IPV) control is based on marker vaccination <strong>and</strong>/or<br />

removal of infected animals which is mainly depending on the initial<br />

BHV-1 sero-prevalences. A field-infected animal has to be considered<br />

over its total lifespan as a latently infected carrier <strong>and</strong> as a potential<br />

source of infection. Therefore, BHV-1 diagnostics is crucial <strong>and</strong> often<br />

confronted with exceptional dem<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> requirements. For the<br />

sensitive <strong>and</strong> specific detection of BHV-1 antibodies, three different<br />

types of marker-independent tests are available: glycoprotein B (gB)blocking<br />

ELISAs, indirect ELISA tests, <strong>and</strong> the serum neutralisation<br />

test (NT). However, the gB-blocking assays represent the most<br />

IBR Workshop<br />

Angora, Beetal <strong>and</strong> Daira Din Panah) maintained at Rakh Khaire<br />

Wala Farm District Layyah. All the sera samples were first examined<br />

through Rose Bengal Plate Test (RBPT) <strong>and</strong> the samples found<br />

positive through RBPT were further confirmed through Serum<br />

Agglutination Test (SAT).<br />

Results: The overall prevalence of brucellosis was found to be 11%<br />

<strong>and</strong> 9.8% through Rose Bengal Plate Test <strong>and</strong> Serum Agglutination<br />

Test, respectively. Overall the females showed maximum prevalence of<br />

brucellosis in all breeds by RBPT (11.34%) <strong>and</strong> SAT (10.18%). Teddy<br />

goats showed the highest prevalence of brucellosis followed by Pak<br />

Angora, Beetal <strong>and</strong> Daira Din Panah.<br />

Discussion: This was a large scale screening of sera <strong>and</strong> in such cases<br />

the RBPT is an excellent tool <strong>and</strong> is the recommended method. This<br />

test has been widely employed in many successful Nationals<br />

Brucellosis Eradication Programmes. Based on the results, it can be<br />

concluded that the high prevalence of brucellosis is present in study<br />

area. Treatment of infected sheep <strong>and</strong> goats with antibiotics should be<br />

discouraged because the antibiotics may appear in the human food<br />

chain <strong>and</strong> this would be disastrous for the milk industry. Instead, efforts<br />

should be directed towards controlling <strong>and</strong> eradicating brucellosis from<br />

small ruminants by adopting integrated control strategies. Serological<br />

testing <strong>and</strong> slaughter of the animals that react positively with Brucella<br />

antigens successfully eradicated brucellosis in several countries.<br />

Vaccination against Br. melitensis may also be helpful in reducing the<br />

number of infected flocks <strong>and</strong> ultimately permit brucellosis control.<br />

Key words: goat, brucellosis, Pakistan<br />

sensitive test systems. In non-vaccinated animals, one ELISA system is<br />

commonly used as a screening test. In doubtful cases, a second ELISA<br />

principle can be employed as a confirmatory test. In contrast, BHV-1control<br />

according to the marker concept is based on vaccination with<br />

glycoprotein E (gE)-deleted marker vaccines. The marker-diagnostics<br />

is used to confirm the absence of gE-specific antibodies in "BHV-1<br />

(gE-antibody) free" animals <strong>and</strong> to detect gE-antibodies in cattle<br />

infected with wild type virus. Therefore, determination of absence or<br />

presence of antibodies directed against gE is the only tool to<br />

discriminate marker-vaccinated from wild type virus infected animals.<br />

In addition, gE-blocking ELISAs are at the moment the only available<br />

test system for the detection of gE-specific antibodies. The possibilities<br />

<strong>and</strong> limitations of the diagnostic systems for BHV-1 will be presented<br />

<strong>and</strong> discussed, e.g. problems of the different sensitivity levels of<br />

conventional <strong>and</strong> gE-marker tests, the failure of testing milk samples<br />

for gE-antibodies as well as several phenomena like the “vaccinationphenomenon”<br />

<strong>and</strong> the “fresh sample-phenomenon”. It will be<br />

demonstrated that the choice of the appropriate test system <strong>and</strong> the<br />

establishment of an internal batch control are prerequisites of the<br />

optimal performance of BHV-1-ELISA systems. In addition, the<br />

reasons for the occurrence of so-called “pseudo-vaccinees” - animals<br />

that are not marker vaccinated but react clearly positive for BHV-1 <strong>and</strong><br />

negative for gE - will be analysed. Finally, the lack of confirmatory<br />

marker tests must be compensated so far by evaluation of the<br />

epidemiological plausibility of the test results <strong>and</strong> by emphasising<br />

diagnosis on the herd level.<br />

Key words: IBR, BHV-1, diagnostics, marker tests<br />

242 Prevalence <strong>and</strong> Risk Factors for Bovine Herpesvirus 1<br />

Infection in Cattle Herds from Parana State, Brazil<br />

J. Dias, A. Alfieri, J. Ferreira Neto, E. Muller, A. Alfieri<br />

Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Departamento de Medicina<br />

Veterinária Preventiva, Londrina, Brazil<br />

The Brazilian cattle herd is constituted for approximately 205 million<br />

heads. The Paraná state, located in southern region of Brazil, is<br />

characterized by a developed livestock of beef <strong>and</strong> dairy cattle, with<br />

approximately 10.5 million heads. Throughout Brazil, the bovine<br />

herpesvirus (BoHV) infection is related to reproductive problems.<br />

Vulvovanigitis <strong>and</strong> meningoencephalitis are other clinical outcomes<br />

observed in infected herds. Serological surveys have showed a high<br />

Abortion – IBR Workshop 323

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!