13.07.2015 Views

Between Facts and Norms - Contributions to a ... - Blogs Unpad

Between Facts and Norms - Contributions to a ... - Blogs Unpad

Between Facts and Norms - Contributions to a ... - Blogs Unpad

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

84Chapter 3tive expectation of an orientation <strong>to</strong> the common good, becausethis procedure can draw its legitimating force only from a processin which citizens reach an underst<strong>and</strong>ing about the rules for theirliving <strong>to</strong>gether. In modern societies as well, the law can fulfill thefunction of stabilizing behavioral expectations only if it preservesan internal connection with the socially integrating force of communicativeaction.I want <strong>to</strong> elucidate this puzzling connection between privateliberties <strong>and</strong> civic au<strong>to</strong>nomy with the help of the discourse concep<strong>to</strong>f law. This connection involves a stubborn problem, which I willfirst discuss in two different contexts. Thus far no one has succeededin satisfac<strong>to</strong>rily reconciling private <strong>and</strong> public au<strong>to</strong>nomy ata fundamental conceptual level, as is evident from the unclarifiedrelation between individual rights <strong>and</strong> public law in the field ofjurisprudence, as well as from the unresolved competition betweenhuman rights <strong>and</strong> popular sovereignty in social-contract theory(section 3.1). In both cases the difficulties stem not only fromcertain premises rooted in the philosophy of consciousness but alsofrom a metaphysical legacy inherited from natural law, namely, thesubordination of positive law <strong>to</strong> natural or moral law. In fact,however, positive law <strong>and</strong> postconventional morality emerge co-. originally from the crumbling edifice of substantial ethical life.Kant's analysis of the form oflaw provides an occasion <strong>to</strong> discuss therelation between law <strong>and</strong> morality, in order <strong>to</strong> show that theprinciple of democracy must not be subordinated <strong>to</strong> the moralprinciple, as it is in Kantian legal theory (section 3.2). Only afterthis preliminary spadework can I ground the system of rights withthe help of the discourse principle, so that it becomes clear whyprivate <strong>and</strong> public au<strong>to</strong>nomy, human rights <strong>and</strong> popular sovereignty,mutually presuppose one another (section 3.3).3.1 Private <strong>and</strong> Public Au<strong>to</strong>nomy, Human Rights <strong>and</strong> PopularSovereignty3.1.1In German civil-law jurisprudence, which in Germany has beendecisive for the underst<strong>and</strong>ing of law in general, the theory of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!