13.07.2015 Views

Between Facts and Norms - Contributions to a ... - Blogs Unpad

Between Facts and Norms - Contributions to a ... - Blogs Unpad

Between Facts and Norms - Contributions to a ... - Blogs Unpad

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

IllA Reconstructive Approach <strong>to</strong> Law ltion, which take place in forms of communication that are them-( *selves legally guaranteed.One way we can distinguish the principles of democracy <strong>and</strong>morality is by their different levels of reference. The other is by thedifference between legal norms <strong>and</strong> other action norms. Whereasthe moral principle extends <strong>to</strong> any norm for whose justificationmoral arguments are both necessary <strong>and</strong> sufficient, the democraticprinciple is tailored <strong>to</strong> legal norms. These rules differ from thesimple, more or less quasi-natural norms o£ interaction we find ineveryday life. The legal form in which these norms are clad is arelatively recent product of social evolution. In contrast <strong>to</strong> naturallyemergent rules, whose validity can be judged solely from the moralpoint of view, legal norms have an artificial character; they constitutean intentionally produced layer of action norms that arereflexive in the sense o£being applicable <strong>to</strong> themselves. Hence theprinciple of democracy must not only establish a procedure oflegitimate lawmaking, it must also steer the production of the legalmedium itself: The democratic principle must specifY, in accordance :with the discourse principle, the conditions <strong>to</strong> be satisfied by Jindividual rights in general, that is, by any rights suitable for theconstitution of a legal community <strong>and</strong> capable of providing themedium for this community's self-organization. Thus, along withthe system o£ rights, one must also create the language in which acommunity can underst<strong>and</strong> itself as a voluntary association of free<strong>and</strong> equal consociates under law.Corresponding <strong>to</strong> the two ways in which we have distinguishedthe principles of democracy <strong>and</strong> morality, then, are two tasks therequired system of rights is supposed <strong>to</strong> solve. It should institutionalizethe communicative framework for a rational political willformation,<strong>and</strong> it should ensure the very medium in which alonethis will-formation can express itself as the common will of freelyassociated legal persons. To specifY this second task, we mustprecisely define the formal characteristics of the medium of law.',,., 1'3.2.2In what follows, I want <strong>to</strong> elucidate the formal characteristics oflawby means of the complementary relation between law <strong>and</strong> morality.This elucidation is part of a functional explanation <strong>and</strong> not a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!