13.07.2015 Views

Between Facts and Norms - Contributions to a ... - Blogs Unpad

Between Facts and Norms - Contributions to a ... - Blogs Unpad

Between Facts and Norms - Contributions to a ... - Blogs Unpad

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

401Paradigms of Lawit does not mean that every right that can serve the private pursui<strong>to</strong>f an au<strong>to</strong>nomous life refers <strong>to</strong> the protection of a private sphereconceived in sociological terms <strong>and</strong> privileged from an ethicalperspective.Most important, restrictions on the classical liberties in the"social" sphere (as distinct from broader or narrower privatespheres) certainly cannot be traced back <strong>to</strong> the interference of otherlegal principles (such as social justice or social responsibility).What appears as a restriction is only the flip side of the enforcemen<strong>to</strong>f equal individual liberties for all. This is because private au<strong>to</strong>nomy,in the sense of this universal right <strong>to</strong> equal liberties,implies a universal right of equality, that is, the right <strong>to</strong> equaltreatment according <strong>to</strong> norms that guarantee substantive legalequality. This may produce actual restrictions for one or anotherparty in comparison <strong>to</strong> the status quo ante. If so, such restrictionsare not limitations on the principle oflegal freedom, but arise as aresult of abolishing privileges that are incompatible with the equaldistribution of individual liberties required by this principle.9.1.3The social-welfare model emerged from the reformist critique ofbourgeois formal law. According <strong>to</strong> this model, an economicsociety institutionalized in the form of private law (above allthrough property rights <strong>and</strong> contractual freedom) was separatedfrom the sphere of the common good, the state, <strong>and</strong> left <strong>to</strong> thespontaneous workings of market mechanisms. This "private-lawsociety" was tailored for the au<strong>to</strong>nomy of legal subjects who,primarily as market participants, would seek <strong>and</strong> find their happinessby pursuing their own particular interests as rationally aspossible. The interpenetration of the principle of legal freedomwith the universal right <strong>to</strong> equality grounded the normative expectationthat social justice could be concomitantly established bydefining spheres of individual liberty, that is, by guaranteeing anegative legal status connected with a claim <strong>to</strong> correspondingindividual legal protection. For the right of each person <strong>to</strong> do as shepleases within the framework of laws is legitimate only under thecondition that these laws guarantee equal treatment in the sense of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!