13.07.2015 Views

Between Facts and Norms - Contributions to a ... - Blogs Unpad

Between Facts and Norms - Contributions to a ... - Blogs Unpad

Between Facts and Norms - Contributions to a ... - Blogs Unpad

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

493-·-------· -·· .. ------ ·····---Citizenship <strong>and</strong> National IdentityCommunity <strong>to</strong> a political union, disintegrating. This is confirmedby a glance back at its genesis in early modernity.In modern Europe, the premodern form of empire that used <strong>to</strong>unite numerous peoples remained rather unstable, as shown in thecases of the Holy Roman Empire or the Russian <strong>and</strong> Ot<strong>to</strong>manempires. A second, federal form of state emerged from the belt ofCentral European cities. It was above all in Switzerl<strong>and</strong> that afederation developed that was strong enough <strong>to</strong> balance the ethnictensions within a multicultural association of citizens. But it wasonly the third form, the ceqtrally administered terri<strong>to</strong>rial state, thatcame <strong>to</strong> have a lasting formative effect on the structure of theEuropean system of states. It first emerged-as in Portugal, Spain,France, Engl<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> Sweden-from kingdoms. Later, as democratizationproceeded along the lines of the French example, it·developed in<strong>to</strong> the nation-state. This state formation secured theboundary conditions under which the capitalist economic systemcould develop worldwide. That is, the nation-state provided theinfrastructure for an administration disciplined by the rule of law,<strong>and</strong> it guaranteed a realm of individual <strong>and</strong> collective action freeof state interference. Moreover-<strong>and</strong> this is what primarily interestsus here-it laid the foundation for the ethnic <strong>and</strong> culturalhomogeneity that made it possible, beginning in the late eighteenthcentury, <strong>to</strong> forge ahead with the democratization of government,albeit at the cost of excluding <strong>and</strong> oppressing minorities.Nation-state <strong>and</strong> democracy are twins born of the French Revolution.From a cultural point of view, they both st<strong>and</strong> under theshadow of nationalism.This national consciousness is a specifically modern manifestationof cultural integration. The political consciousness of nationalmembership arises from a dynamic that first <strong>to</strong>ok hold of thepopulation after processes of economic <strong>and</strong> social modernizationhad <strong>to</strong>rn people from their places in the social hierarchy, simultaneouslymobilizing <strong>and</strong> isolating them as individuals. Nationalismis a form of consciousness that presupposes an appropriation,filtered by his<strong>to</strong>riography <strong>and</strong> reflection, of cultural traditions.Originating in an educated bourgeois public, it spreads throughthe channels of modern mass communication. Both elements, itsliterary mediation <strong>and</strong> its dissemination through public media,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!