13.07.2015 Views

Between Facts and Norms - Contributions to a ... - Blogs Unpad

Between Facts and Norms - Contributions to a ... - Blogs Unpad

Between Facts and Norms - Contributions to a ... - Blogs Unpad

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

288Chapter 7empirical level, without referring <strong>to</strong> the validity dimension of law<strong>and</strong> the legitimating force of the democratic genesis of law.Thus far we have taken the perspective of legal theory <strong>and</strong>pursued a tension, inhabiting the law itsel£, between facticity <strong>and</strong>validity. In what follows, our theme will be the external relationbetween facticity <strong>and</strong> validity, namely, the tension between thenormative self-underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the constitutional state, as explainedin discourse-theoretic terms, <strong>and</strong> the social facticity of thepolitical processes that run their course along more or less constitutionallines. This brings us back <strong>to</strong> social theory, the dominantapproach in the first two chapters. It was already clear from theinternal perspective o£ legal theory that the system of rights takesshape in his<strong>to</strong>rical constitutions <strong>and</strong> is implemented in variousinstitutions. Rather than dwell on these two levels-comparativeconstitutional law <strong>and</strong> the political science of institutions-! willseek out a direct transition from normative models of democracy<strong>to</strong> sociological theories of democracy. Thus far we have dealt withthe generation, allocation, <strong>and</strong> exercise of political power in termsof the normative considerations that govern the constitutionalstate <strong>and</strong> its organization. In that context, the key question is howcommunicative power ought <strong>to</strong> be related <strong>to</strong> administrative <strong>and</strong>· social power. Political sociology examines this same phenomenonfrom a different perspective.Before going in<strong>to</strong> "realist" theories of democracy in the nextchapter, I would like <strong>to</strong> prepare the necessary change in perspectivestep by step. First I argue against a reductionist concept ofdemocracy that eliminates the element of democratic legitimacyfrom power <strong>and</strong> law (sec. 7.1). Mter comparing different substantivemodels of democracy, I develop a procedural concept ofdemocratic process. This concept, which breaks with a holisticmodel of society centered in the state, claims <strong>to</strong> be neutral withrespect <strong>to</strong> competing worldviews <strong>and</strong> forms of life (sec. 7.2) .Finally, I pursue Robert Dahl's attempt at a sociological translation<strong>and</strong> empirical testing of the procedural underst<strong>and</strong>ing of democracy.Here my goal is <strong>to</strong> clarifY what it means <strong>to</strong> "confront" the ideaof the self-organization of freely associated citizens with the realityof highly complex societies (sec. 7.3).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!