13.07.2015 Views

Between Facts and Norms - Contributions to a ... - Blogs Unpad

Between Facts and Norms - Contributions to a ... - Blogs Unpad

Between Facts and Norms - Contributions to a ... - Blogs Unpad

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

186Chapter 4the communicatively fluid sovereignty of citizens instantiates itselfin the power of public discourses that spring from au<strong>to</strong>nomouspublic spheres but take shape in the decisions of democratic, politicallyaccountable legislative bodies, then the pluralism of beliefs <strong>and</strong>interests is not suppressed but unleashed <strong>and</strong> recognized in revisablemority decisions as well as in compromises. The unity of acompletely proceduralized reason then retreats in<strong>to</strong> the discursivestructure of public communication. This reason refuses <strong>to</strong> concedethat a consensus is free of coercion, <strong>and</strong> hence has legitimatingforce, unless the consensus has come about under the fallibilistproviso <strong>and</strong> on the basis of an anarchic, unfettered communicativefreedom. In the vertigo of this freedom, there is no longer any fixedpoint outside that of democratic procedure itself, a procedurewhose meaning is already implicit in the system of rights.4.3.3The classical separation of powers is explained by differentiatinggovernmental functions: whereas the legislature justifies <strong>and</strong> passesgeneral programs <strong>and</strong> the judiciary resolves action conflicts on thisstatu<strong>to</strong>ry basis, the administration is responsible for implementinglegal programs that are not self-executing but need <strong>to</strong> be carriedout. By rendering authoritative decisions about what is legal <strong>and</strong>illegal in individual cases, the judiciary treats existing law as law,namely, from the normative st<strong>and</strong>point of stabilizing behavioralexpectations. The administration processes the teleological contentsof existing law insofar as the latter puts policies in statu<strong>to</strong>ryform <strong>and</strong> steers the administrative realization of collective goals.From the st<strong>and</strong>point of the logical division of labor in argumentation,juristicdiscourses serve <strong>to</strong> apply norms, whereas the rationalityof administrative activity is secured mainly through pragmaticdiscourses.Pragmatic discourses are tailored <strong>to</strong> the choice of technologies<strong>and</strong> strategies that, under the given circumstances (such as limitedresources, deadlines, resistances in acceptance, <strong>and</strong> other restrictions),are suitable for realizing the values <strong>and</strong> goals previously setby the legislature:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!