Between Facts and Norms - Contributions to a ... - Blogs Unpad

538Notes to pages 197-2104. Cf. R. Dreier, Was ist und wozu Allgemeine Rechtstheorie ? (Tiibingen, 1975); N.MacCormick, Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory (Oxford, 1978).5.]. Wroblewski, "Legal Syllogism and Rationality ofjudicial Decision," Rechtstheorie5 (1974): 33-46.6. R. Dworkin, Taking Rights Seriously (Cambridge, Mass., 1978), p. 87.7. H.-G. Gadamer, Truth and Method, 2d. ed., trans. ]. Weinsheimer and D. G.Marshall (New York, 1990).8. W. Hasse mer, 'Juristische Hermeneutik," Archiv fur Rechts- und Soz.ialphilosophie72 (1986): 195ff. ; see also U. Neumann,JuristischeArgumentationslehre (Darmstadt,1986)' pp. 54ff.9.]. Esser, Grundsatz. und Norm in der richterlichen Fortbildung des Privatsrechts, 2nded. (Tiibingen, 1964) , p. 182; see also his Vorverstiindnis und Methodenwahl in derRechtsfindung (Kronberg, 1972).10. G. Ellscheid and W. Hassemer, eds., Interessenjurisprudenz (Darmstadt, 1974) .11. On American Legal Realism, see R. S. Summers, Instrumentalism and AmericanLegal Theory (Ithaca, 1982).12. H. L. A. Hart, The Concept of Law (Oxford, 1961), p. 107: "The rule ofrecognition exists only as a complex, but normally concordant, practice of thecourts, officials, and private persons in identifYing the law by reference to certaincriteria. Its existence is a matter of fact."13. Dworkin, Taking Rights Seriously, p. 182.14. Dworkin, Taking Rights Seriously, p. 92.15. R. Alexy, "Zur Kritikdes Rechtspositivismus," in R. Dreier, ed., Rechtspositivismusund Wertbezug des Rechts (Stuttgart, 1990), pp. 9-26; for a contrasting view, see N.Hoerster, Verteidigung des Rechtspositivismus (Frankfurt am Main, 1989) .16. B. Peters, Rationalitiit, Recht und Gesellschaft (Frankfurt am Main, 1991), pp.278f.17. Dworkin, Taking Rights Seriously, p. 82.18. Cf. R. Alexy, Theorie der Grundrechte (Baden-Baden, 1985), pp. 75ff.; for acriticism of this view, see K. Gunther, The Sense of Appropriateness: ApplicationDiscourses in Morality and Law, trans.]. Farrell (Albany, 1993), pp. 212ff. [On theconcept of value involved in Giiterabwiigung, see chap. 6 n28. Trans.]19. ]. Habermas, The Theory of Communicative Action, trans. T. McCarthy, 2 vols.(Boston, 1984, 1987) 1:130-36 (hereafter, TCA) ; see also ]. Habermas, On theLogic oftheSocialSciences, trans. S. W. Nicholsen and]. A. Stark (Cambridge, Mass.,1988), pp. 143ff.20. R. Dworkin, Law's Empire, pp. 52f., 419 n2.21. One of the few works that relates Dworkin's concept of interpretation to theEuropean discussion, especially to the views ofGadamer, Derrida, and myself, isDavid C. Hoy's "Interpreting the Law: Hermeneutical and PoststructuralistPerspectives," Southern California Law Review 58 (1985): 135-76; see also his