13.07.2015 Views

Between Facts and Norms - Contributions to a ... - Blogs Unpad

Between Facts and Norms - Contributions to a ... - Blogs Unpad

Between Facts and Norms - Contributions to a ... - Blogs Unpad

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

167A Reconstructive Approach <strong>to</strong> Law IIone another during the actual bargaining, so that all the affectedinterests can come in<strong>to</strong> play <strong>and</strong> have equal chances of prevailing.To the extent that these conditions are met, there are grounds forpresuming that negotiated agreements are fair.Such procedures define the equal consideration of the interestsof each participant as a problem of procedurally correct agreementsamong power holders. Thus it is nota matter ofmutual underst<strong>and</strong>ingamong discourse participants who make use of their communicativefreedom <strong>to</strong> adopt positions <strong>to</strong>ward criticizable validity claimsin order <strong>to</strong> mutually convinceone another of their arguments. Froma normative perspective, however, fair compromise formation doesnot st<strong>and</strong> on its own, for the procedural conditions under whichactual compromises enjoy the presumption of fairness must bejustified in moral discourses. Moreover, bargaining first becomes ·permissible <strong>and</strong> necessary when only particular-<strong>and</strong> no generalizable-interestsare involved, something that again can be testedonly in moral discourses.32 Fair bargaining, then, does not destroythe discourse principle but rather indirectly presupposes it.So compromise formation cannot simply replace moral discourses;this is why political will-formation cannot be reduced <strong>to</strong>compromise. This applies mutatis mut<strong>and</strong>is <strong>to</strong> ethical-politicaldiscourses as well, for their results must at least be compatible withmoral principles. A fundamentalist self-underst<strong>and</strong>ing, for example,often privileges value choices that subordinate individualrights <strong>to</strong> collective goals <strong>and</strong> thus favor nonegalitarian regulations.Only under the conditions of postmetaphysical thinking do ethicalpoliticaldiscourses lead <strong>to</strong> regulations that lie per se in the equalinterest of all members. So only the compatibility of all discursivelyachieved or negotiated programs with what is morally justifiableensures that the discourse principle has been thoroughly applied.Rational political will-formation appears in the process model as anetwork of discourses <strong>and</strong> negotiations that can be linked up <strong>to</strong> oneanother via multiple pathways. However, transfers occur at leastalong the paths shown in figure 2.Political will-formation terminates in resolutions about policies<strong>and</strong> legal programs that must be formulated in the language o£law.This ultimately makes a judicial review necessary in which the newprograms are examined for their fit with the existing legal system.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!