13.07.2015 Views

Between Facts and Norms - Contributions to a ... - Blogs Unpad

Between Facts and Norms - Contributions to a ... - Blogs Unpad

Between Facts and Norms - Contributions to a ... - Blogs Unpad

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

264Chapter 6depends for its part on the manner <strong>and</strong> extent <strong>to</strong> which democraticcitizens can effectively exercise their communicative <strong>and</strong> participa<strong>to</strong>ryrights. Hence, the constitutional court must examine thecontents of disputed norms primarily in connection with thecommunicative presuppositions <strong>and</strong> procedural conditions of thelegislative process. Such a procedural underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the constitutionplaces the problem of legitimating constitutional review in thecontext of a theory of democracy. In this respect, the Americ<strong>and</strong>iscussion is more informative than the German.The apposite conception developed by Ely adopts a skepticalattitude <strong>to</strong>ward judicial activism. His approach is admittedly intended<strong>to</strong> relieve adjudication of any orientation <strong>to</strong> legal principleswith moral or ethical origins. Ely proceeds on the assumption thatthe United States Constitution primarily regulates organizational<strong>and</strong> procedural problems <strong>and</strong> is not designed <strong>to</strong> single out <strong>and</strong>implement basic values. In his view, it is not substantive but formalregulations (like equal protection or due process) that make up thesubstance of the Constitution: "Our Constitution has always beensubstantially concerned with preserving liberty . ... The question . ..is how that concern has been pursued. The principle answers <strong>to</strong>that . .. are by a quite extensive set of procedural protections, <strong>and</strong>by a still more elaborate scheme designed <strong>to</strong> ensure that in themaking of substantive choices the decision process will be open <strong>to</strong>all on something approaching an equal basis, with the decisionmakers held <strong>to</strong> a duty <strong>to</strong> take in<strong>to</strong> account the interests of all thosetheir decisions affect. "42 If the Supreme Court is supposed <strong>to</strong>oversee adherence <strong>to</strong> the Constitution, then it must in the first placelook after the procedures <strong>and</strong> organizational norms on which thelegitimating effect of the democratic process depends. The Courtmust ensure that the "channels" for the inclusive opinion- <strong>and</strong> willformationprocesses through which a democratic legal communityorganizes itself remain intact: "unblocking s<strong>to</strong>ppages in the democraticprocess is what judicial review ought preeminently <strong>to</strong> beabout. "43From this perspective, the communicative <strong>and</strong> participa<strong>to</strong>ryrights that are constitutive for democratic opinion- <strong>and</strong> will-formationacquire a privileged position. The principle of equal treatmentis not just violated by the content of laws that possibly discriminate

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!