13.07.2015 Views

Between Facts and Norms - Contributions to a ... - Blogs Unpad

Between Facts and Norms - Contributions to a ... - Blogs Unpad

Between Facts and Norms - Contributions to a ... - Blogs Unpad

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

118- ------------- -----Chapter 3quired <strong>to</strong> answer the growing need for regulation <strong>and</strong> organizationin increasingly complex societies. The real proportions becomeevident only when one turns things around <strong>and</strong> also views moralityfrom the vantage point of the legal system. A principled moralitywhose effectiveness was based solely on socialization processes <strong>and</strong>individual conscience would remain restricted <strong>to</strong> a narrow radiusof action. Through a legal system with which it remains internallycoupled, however, morality can spread <strong>to</strong> all spheres of action,including those systemically independent spheres of media-steeredinteractions that unburden ac<strong>to</strong>rs of all moral expectations otherthan that of a general obedience <strong>to</strong> law. In less complex societies,socially integrating force inheres in the ethos of a form of life,inasmuch as this integral ethical life binds all the components ofthe lifeworld <strong>to</strong>gether, attuning concrete duties <strong>to</strong> institutions <strong>and</strong>linking them with motivations. Under conditions of high complexity,moral contents can spread throughout a society along thechannels of legal regulation.3.3 A Discourse-Theoretic Justification of Basic Rights:The Discourse Principle, the Legal Form, <strong>and</strong> theDemocratic Principle_We can now tie the various str<strong>and</strong>s of argument <strong>to</strong>gether, in order,<strong>to</strong> introduce a system of rights that gives equal weight <strong>to</strong> both theJprivate <strong>and</strong> the public au<strong>to</strong>nomy of the citi ie n. This system should(contain precisely the basic rights that citizens must mutually grantlone another if they want <strong>to</strong> legitimately regulate their life in\COmmon by means of positive law. As in social-contract theories,these rights should be introduced first of all from the perspectiveof a nonparticipant. We have already taken a number of steps thatprepare for this. We began by recalling the doctrinal his<strong>to</strong>ry of civillaw from Savigny <strong>to</strong> Kelsen in order <strong>to</strong> show that a legitimacy basedon legality is rather puzzling. We then went on <strong>to</strong> interpret theconcept of civic au<strong>to</strong>nomy in discourse-theoretic terms; this brough<strong>to</strong>ut the internal connection between human rights <strong>and</strong> popularsovereignty. Finally, we investigated the complementary relationbetween law <strong>and</strong> morality so as <strong>to</strong> clarify the formal characteristicsthat distinguish legal norms from general norms of action. Interest-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!