13.07.2015 Views

Between Facts and Norms - Contributions to a ... - Blogs Unpad

Between Facts and Norms - Contributions to a ... - Blogs Unpad

Between Facts and Norms - Contributions to a ... - Blogs Unpad

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

46Chapter 2-- -- -- -- - - -- - ---modern law-<strong>and</strong> reduced this law <strong>to</strong> an epiphenomenon. Withthis, the market mechanism that was discovered <strong>and</strong> analyzed bypolitical economy also <strong>to</strong>ok the lead in social theory. The realisticmodel of an anonymous, unintentional sociation taking placebehind the ac<strong>to</strong>rs' backs replaced the idealistic model of anassociation that legal subjects intentionally bring about <strong>and</strong> continuouslysustain.Marx, however, still held <strong>to</strong> a classical concept whose influenceextends from Aris<strong>to</strong>tle <strong>to</strong> Hegel, that of society as <strong>to</strong>tality. He simply<strong>to</strong>ok the apex <strong>and</strong> center of the social whole, in<strong>to</strong> which individualsare incorporated as parts, <strong>and</strong> turned them right side up. Themanifest unity of a legally constituted political order was replacedby the systemically produced, latent unity of capital's self-valorization.As a negative <strong>to</strong>tality, the latter was still related <strong>to</strong> its opposite,the preserved classical image of a consciously produced <strong>to</strong>tality.Mter thinkers from Vico <strong>to</strong> Condorcet shifted the teleology ofnature in<strong>to</strong> the dimension of his<strong>to</strong>ry,5 society could be conceivedas a developing self-referential <strong>to</strong>tality that realizes its telos ofintentional association only in the course of the his<strong>to</strong>rical process.Specifically, it realizes its essence in the future association of producerswho, freed of the commodity fetish, will have brought the. conditions of the material life process under their common control.Other objections aside, this precarious construction could withst<strong>and</strong>neither the critique leveled against its teleological backgroundassumptions nor the doubts cast on the holistic concept ofsociety. However, the strictly objectivating approach favored byMarx, which examines mechanisms of integration from an externalperspective, has successfully worked its way in<strong>to</strong> various theoreticaltraditions. From this perspective, the image of social integrationoccurring through values, norms, communication, <strong>and</strong> even lawdisintegrates in<strong>to</strong> mere illusion. Once the last hopes of the philosophyof his<strong>to</strong>ry disappeared from Marxist functionalism, society leftbehind the dynamics of his<strong>to</strong>ry <strong>and</strong>, gripped by the repetitioncompulsions of a self-accelerating <strong>and</strong> all-pervasive process ofaccumulation, became a frozen world of reified social relations.6This br<strong>and</strong> of systems theory owes its melancholic sense <strong>to</strong> the factthat it still secretly refers <strong>to</strong> a <strong>to</strong>tality, now negatively construed as

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!