13.07.2015 Views

Between Facts and Norms - Contributions to a ... - Blogs Unpad

Between Facts and Norms - Contributions to a ... - Blogs Unpad

Between Facts and Norms - Contributions to a ... - Blogs Unpad

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

93_, ___ , , ___ _____ , __ ____ ________A Reconstructive Approach <strong>to</strong> Law Imerely egocentric attitude from the parties concluding a socialcontract in the state of nature: "the contract establishing a civilconstitution ... is of so unique a kind that . .. it is in principleessentially different from all others in what it founds."23 Whereasparties usually conclude a contract "<strong>to</strong> some determinate end," thesocial contract is "an end in itself." It grounds "the right of men [<strong>to</strong>live] under public coercive law, through which each can receive hisdue <strong>and</strong> can be made secure from the interference of others."24 InKant's view the parties do not agree <strong>to</strong> appoint a sovereign <strong>to</strong> whomthey cede the power <strong>to</strong> make laws. Rather, the social contract isunique in not having any specific content at all; it provides insteadthe model for a kind of sociation ruled by the principle oflaw. It laysdown the performative conditions under which rights acquirelegitimate validity, for "right is the limitation of each person's ·freedom so that it is compatible with the freedom of everyone,insofar as this is possible in accord with a general law."25Under this aspect, the social contract serves <strong>to</strong> institutionalize thesingle "innate" right <strong>to</strong> equal liberties. Kant sees this primordialhuman right as grounded in the au<strong>to</strong>nomous will of individualswho, as moral persons, have at their prior disposal the socialperspective of a practical reason that tests laws. On the basis of thisreason, they have moral-<strong>and</strong> not just prudential-grounds fortheir move out of the condition of unprotected freedom. At thesame time, Kant sees that the "single human right" must differentiateitself in<strong>to</strong> a system of rights through which both "the freedom ofevery member of society as a human being" as well as "the equalityof each member with every other as a subject" assume a positiveshape.26 This happens in the form of"public laws," which can claimlegitimacy only as acts ofthe public will of au<strong>to</strong>nomous <strong>and</strong> unitedcitizens: establishing public law "is possible through no other willthan that belonging <strong>to</strong> the people collectively (because all decidefor all, hence each for himself) ; for only <strong>to</strong> oneself can one neverdo injustice."27 Because the question concerning the legitimacy offreedom-securing laws must find an answer within positive law, thesocial contract establishes the principle of law by binding thelegisla<strong>to</strong>r's political will-formation <strong>to</strong> conditions of a democraticprocedure; under these conditions the results arrived at in conformitywith this procedure express per se the concurring will or

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!