13.07.2015 Views

Between Facts and Norms - Contributions to a ... - Blogs Unpad

Between Facts and Norms - Contributions to a ... - Blogs Unpad

Between Facts and Norms - Contributions to a ... - Blogs Unpad

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

127A Reconstructive Approach <strong>to</strong> Law I- --- · ---------- ·------light of the discourse principle) must in turn be legally guaranteed. IThis end is served by the basic political rights <strong>to</strong> participate in /processes that form the legisla<strong>to</strong>r's opinion <strong>and</strong> will.After this change in perspective, we can no longer ground equalcommunicative <strong>and</strong> participa<strong>to</strong>ry rights from our vantage point. Thecitizens themselves become those who deliberate <strong>and</strong>, acting as aconstitutional assembly, decide how they must fashion the rightsthat give the discourse principle legal shape as a principle ofdemocracy. According <strong>to</strong> the discourse principle,just those normsdeserve <strong>to</strong> be valid that could meet with the approval of thosepotentially affected, insofar as the latter participate in rationaldiscourses. Hence the desired political rights must guaranteeparticipation in all deliberative <strong>and</strong> decisional processes relevant<strong>to</strong> legislation <strong>and</strong> must do so in a way that provides each personwith equal chances <strong>to</strong> exercise the communicative freedom <strong>to</strong> takea position on criticizable validity claims. Equal opportunities forthe political use of communicative freedoms require a legallystructured deliberative praxis in which the discourse principle isapplied. Just as communicative freedom prior <strong>to</strong> any institutionalizationrefers <strong>to</strong> appropriate occasions for the use of languageoriented <strong>to</strong>ward mutual underst<strong>and</strong>ing, so also do political rightsinparticular, entitlements <strong>to</strong> the public use of communicativefreedom-call for the legal institutionalization of various forms ofcommunication <strong>and</strong> the implementation of democratic procedures.These are meant <strong>to</strong> guarantee that all formally <strong>and</strong>procedurally correct outcomes enjoy a presumption oflegitimacy.Rights of equal participation for each person thus result from asymmetrical juridification of the communicative freedom of allcitizens. And this freedom in turn requires forms of discursiveopinion- <strong>and</strong> will-formation that enable an exercise of politicalau<strong>to</strong>nomy in accordance with political rights.If one introduces the system of rights in this way, then one canunderst<strong>and</strong> how popular sovereignty <strong>and</strong> human rights go h<strong>and</strong> inh<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> hence grasp the co-originality of civic <strong>and</strong> privateau<strong>to</strong>nomy. The scope of citizens' public au<strong>to</strong>nomy is not restrictedby natural or moral rights just waiting <strong>to</strong> be put in<strong>to</strong> effect, nor isthe individual's private au<strong>to</strong>nomy merely instrumentalized for thepurposes of popular sovereignty. Nothing is given prior <strong>to</strong> the---1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!