Between Facts and Norms - Contributions to a ... - Blogs Unpad

561Notes to pages 411-41639. P. Haberle, Verfassung als offentlicher ProzejJ (Frankfurt am Main, 1978).40. R. Wietholter, "Proceduralization of the Category of Law," in C.Joerges andD. M. Trubek, eds., Critical Legal Thought (Baden-Baden, 1989), pp. 501-10; inthe same volume, C. Joerges, "Politische Rechtstheorie und Critical LegalStudies," pp. 59 7-644; also G. Briiggemeier, "Wirtschaftsordnung und Staatsverfassung-Mischverfassungdes demokratischen Interventionskapitalismus­Verfassungstheorie des Sozialstaates: Drei Madelle der Verflechtung von Staatund Wirtschaft? ," jahrbuch fur Rechtstheorie und Rechtssoziologie 8 (1982): 60-73.41. E. Schmidt, "Von der Privat- zur Sozialautonomie," juristenzeitung35 ( 1980):158.42. Simi tis, "Wiederentdeckung des Individuums," p. 11 (emphasis added); seealso S. Simi tis, 'Juridification of Labor Relations," in G. Teubner, ed.,juridificationof Social Spheres (Berlin, 1987), pp. 113-61.43 . Simi tis, "Wiederentdeckung des Individuums," p. 10.44. S. Simi tis, "Selbstbestimmung: Illusorisches Projekt oder reale Chance?" inJ. Riisen et a!., eds., Die Zukunft derAufkliirung (Frankfurt am Main, 1988), p. 177:"Intervention was not the result of whim or accident, and thus it cannot be easilyreversed." Cf. also I. Maus, "Verrechtlichung, Entrechtlichung und derFunktionswandel von Institutionen," in G. Gohler, ed., Grundfragen der Theoriepolitischer lnstitutionen (Opladen, 1987), pp. 132-72.45. Alexy, Theorie der Grundrechte, pp. 370, 372: "If no sufficient reason exists forpermitting unequal treatment, then equal treatment is required," or "if sufficientreason exists for requiring unequal treatment, then unequal treatment isrequired."46. Simitis, "Selbstbestimmung," p. 193; see also Simi tis's treatment of developmentsin family law, which lead him to conclude (pp. 184£.):The recognition that each family member is an individual, as well as therecognition that each member has independent interests, in no way makes itnecessary to develop a detailed intervention system that would have the purposeof realizing a precise educational idea and thus would constantly requireelaboration . ... Rather, each legal regulation must be oriented by the significancethat familial interaction has for the development of its members; hence,it must see its real starting paint in family dynamics. The rejection of the idea thatthe family is a harmonious unit . .. is by no means a compelling reason to giveauthorities outside the family the power to make substantive decisions. To beginwith, their intervention must not touch the family members' entitlement andobligation to decide what form their relations to one another must take . ... Inattempting to preserve those affected, for the sake of their self-determination,from burdens that make communication impossible or at least endanger it, onemust not submit them to even more regulatory influences than before.47. H. F. Zacher, 'Juridification in the Field of Social Law," in Teubner, ed.,Juridification, pp. 373-417.