13.07.2015 Views

Between Facts and Norms - Contributions to a ... - Blogs Unpad

Between Facts and Norms - Contributions to a ... - Blogs Unpad

Between Facts and Norms - Contributions to a ... - Blogs Unpad

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

392Chapter 99.1 The Materialization of Private Law9.1.1Expressions like "social ideal," "social model," "social vision," <strong>and</strong>even simply "theory" have become generally accepted ways ofreferring <strong>to</strong> a social epoch's paradigmatic underst<strong>and</strong>ing of law.Such expressions refer <strong>to</strong> those implicit ideas or images of one'sown society that provide a perspective for the practices of making<strong>and</strong> applying law. These images orient the project of realizing anassociation of free <strong>and</strong> equal citizens. However, the his<strong>to</strong>ricalstudies of changes in legal paradigms-as well as doctrinal contributions<strong>to</strong> the paradigm debate-are limited <strong>to</strong> professional interpretationsof existing law. A paradigm is discerned primarily inimportant court decisions <strong>and</strong> usually equated with the judge 'simplicit image of society. For example, Friedrich Kubler, relying onthe phenomenological sociology of knowledge, speaks of the"social construction of reality" that underlies judgments offacts inlegal discourse, that is, how factual courses of events <strong>and</strong> thefunctioning of social action systems are described <strong>and</strong> evaluated:"The 'facts' are mutually related behavioral expectations <strong>and</strong>. motivations, human interactions, small particles from the greatstream of richly interwoven social events. More precisely, they arenot these sequences of events themselves but the ideas the courtforms of these events."8 Henry J. Steiner calls judges' implicittheory of society a "social vision." It forms the context wheneverjudges, in justifYing their decisions, ascertain facts <strong>and</strong> relate these<strong>to</strong> norms: "By social vision . .. I mean perceptions of courts aboutsociety (its socioeconomic structure, patterns of social interaction,moral goals, <strong>and</strong> political ideologies), about social ac<strong>to</strong>rs (theircharacter, behavior, <strong>and</strong> capacities), <strong>and</strong> about accidents (theircauses, volume <strong>and</strong> <strong>to</strong>ll)." Steiner goes on <strong>to</strong> explain this conceptwith reference <strong>to</strong> American adjudication on accident law:The concept then includes courts' underst<strong>and</strong>ing about matters as variedas the incidence <strong>and</strong> social costs of accidents, the operation of marketpricing mechanisms, the capacity of individuals for prudent behavior, thebureaucratic rationality of business forms, the effects of st<strong>and</strong>ard clausesin contracts, <strong>and</strong> ideologies of growth or distribution in the nineteenth

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!