13.07.2015 Views

Between Facts and Norms - Contributions to a ... - Blogs Unpad

Between Facts and Norms - Contributions to a ... - Blogs Unpad

Between Facts and Norms - Contributions to a ... - Blogs Unpad

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

565Notes <strong>to</strong> pages 444-45891 . J. Habermas, The Past as Future, trans. <strong>and</strong> ed. M. Pensky (Lincoln, Nebr.,1994) , pp. 8ff.92. R. Knieper, Nationale Souveriinitiit (Frankfurt am Main, 1991) .93 . Preuss, "Verfassungstheoretische Uberlegungen," p. 64.94. Preuss, "Verfassungstheoretische Uberlegungen," p. 73.Postscriptl. This interpretation of Kantian private law is contested by I. Maus, ZurAujkliirung der Demokratietheorie (Frankfurt am Main, 1992) , pp. 148ff.2. J. Rawls, Political Liberalism (New York, 1993).3. Political questions are normally so complex that they require the simultaneoustreatment of pragmatic, ethical, <strong>and</strong> moral aspects. To be sure, these aspects areonly analytically distinct. Thus my attempt in chap. 4 (pp. 164ff. ) <strong>to</strong> exemplifYdifferent types of discourses by ordering concrete questions in a linear fashionis misleading.4. Naturally, one must distinguish between morally grounded rights <strong>and</strong> policies;not all legitimate political programs ground rights. Thus, on the one h<strong>and</strong>, thereare strong moral grounds for an individual right <strong>to</strong> political asylum <strong>and</strong> acorresponding guarantee of legal remedies (which must not be replaced byinstitutional guarantees provided by the state). On the other h<strong>and</strong>, the individualhas no absolute legal claim <strong>to</strong> immigration, although Western societiesare indeed morally obligated <strong>to</strong> uphold a liberal immigration policy. In appendixII, pp. 513ff. , I do not draw these distinctions clearly enough, but see my reply<strong>to</strong> Charles Taylor, entitled "Struggles for Recognition in the Democratic ConstitutionalState," in A. Gutmann, ed., Multiculturalism (Prince<strong>to</strong>n, 1994) , pp. 107-48.5. 0. HOffe, "Eine Konversion der Kritischen Theorie?" &chtshis<strong>to</strong>rischesjournal12 (1993) : 70-88.6. By this I do not mean <strong>to</strong> deny the limitations that still exist, especially thosedeficits in German citizenship law (Staatsbiirgerrechts) that have been discussedfor some time in connection with the issues of foreigners' right <strong>to</strong> vote in localelections <strong>and</strong> "dual" citizenship; see appendix II, pp. 509ff.7. See the afterword <strong>to</strong> J. Habermas, The Past as Future, trans. <strong>and</strong> ed. M. Pensky(Lincoln, Nebr., 1994) , pp. 143-65.8. C. Larmore, "Die Wurzeln radikaler Demokratie," Deutsche Zeitschrift furPhilosophie 41 (1993) : 327 .9. For the conceptual analysis, see chap. 4, sec. 4.1.10. See pp. 157 -68 <strong>and</strong> pp. 304ff. in this volume.11. See pp. 107ff. in this volume. The idea that a norm deserves universalapproval elucidates what it means for norms of action <strong>to</strong> be valid in terms of arational acceptability that is not just local. This explication of normative validity

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!