22.01.2015 Views

Fulltext - SBU

Fulltext - SBU

Fulltext - SBU

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 3.5.23 Sensitivity and specificity of HADS-D with structured<br />

or semistructured interviews as reference standard.<br />

Author<br />

Year<br />

Reference<br />

Country<br />

Study design<br />

Setting<br />

Population<br />

Inclusion & exclusion criteria<br />

Prevalence<br />

Index test<br />

Reference test<br />

Number of patients<br />

Drop-out rate<br />

Rater<br />

Rater training<br />

Interobserver reliability<br />

Sensitivity<br />

Specificity<br />

Study quality<br />

Comments<br />

Sultan et al<br />

2010<br />

[79]<br />

France<br />

Design<br />

Cross sectional<br />

Setting<br />

Diabetes clinic<br />

Population<br />

n=370 consecutive patients<br />

with type 2 diabetes<br />

Inclusion criteria<br />

Age: 20–75 years<br />

Diabetes diagnosis<br />

≥1 year before test<br />

Index test<br />

HADS<br />

Reference test<br />

MINI<br />

Number of patients<br />

n=302<br />

Mean age: 59.4±10.7 years<br />

Drop-out rate<br />

1.3%<br />

Rater<br />

Psychology interns<br />

Rater training<br />

Unclear<br />

Interobserver reliability<br />

Not stated<br />

MDD<br />

Sensitivity: 53%<br />

(95% CI, 35; 71)<br />

Specificity: 86%<br />

(95% CI, 81; 90)<br />

Moderate<br />

Comments<br />

Sampling method<br />

Adequate<br />

Blinding<br />

Adequate<br />

Handling of missing data<br />

Adequate<br />

Exclusion criteria<br />

No major co-morbidity<br />

Prevalence MDD<br />

10.5%<br />

The table continues on the next page<br />

354 diagnostik och uppföljning av förstämningssyndrom<br />

KAPITEL 3 • Systematisk litteraturgenomgång<br />

355

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!