22.01.2015 Views

Fulltext - SBU

Fulltext - SBU

Fulltext - SBU

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 3.5.38 LCM-p for assessment of severity of bipolar disorder<br />

with CGI-BP as reference standard.<br />

Author<br />

Year<br />

Reference<br />

Country<br />

Study design<br />

Setting<br />

Population<br />

Inclusion & exclusion criteria<br />

Prevalence<br />

Index test<br />

Reference test<br />

Number of patients<br />

Drop-out rate<br />

Rater<br />

Rater training<br />

Interobserver reliability<br />

Outcome measure<br />

Correlation<br />

Study quality<br />

Comments<br />

Meaden et al<br />

2000<br />

[164]<br />

USA<br />

Design<br />

Cross sectional<br />

and longitudinal<br />

Setting<br />

Participants were recruited<br />

from community through<br />

advertisements in newsletters<br />

and websites in Illinois<br />

Population<br />

n=40 (70% females)<br />

Mean age: 43.5 years<br />

(SD 12.2), range 27–72<br />

Inclusion criteria<br />

Current diagnosis of<br />

bipolar disorder I or II.<br />

At least 18 years old<br />

Exclusion criteria<br />

None<br />

Index test<br />

LCM-p<br />

Reference test<br />

CGI-BP ratings immediately<br />

after telephone ratings of<br />

HDRS, YMRS and GAF at<br />

three occasions a month<br />

apart<br />

Number of patients<br />

Time 1: 35<br />

Time 2: 36<br />

Time 3: 32<br />

29 patients had complete<br />

data on all occation<br />

Drop-out rate<br />

See above<br />

Rater of reference test<br />

One researcher<br />

Training of reference test<br />

Not reported<br />

Interobserver reliability<br />

NA<br />

Outcome measure<br />

Spearman correlations<br />

between severity of mania<br />

with LCM-HIGH and CGImania,<br />

severity of depression<br />

with LCM-LOW and CGI-BPdepression,<br />

and the opposite<br />

subscales<br />

LCM-HIGH vs CGI-mania<br />

Time 1: 0.318<br />

Time 2: 0.383<br />

Time 3: 0.556<br />

LCM-LOW vs CGI-depression<br />

Time 1: 0.430<br />

Time 2: 0.593<br />

Time 3: 0.516<br />

LCM-LOW vs CGI-mania<br />

Time 1: –0.193<br />

Time 2: 0.054<br />

Time 3: 0.144<br />

LCM-HIGH vs CGIdepression<br />

Time 1: –0.072<br />

Time 2: 0.019<br />

Time 3: 0.055<br />

Moderate<br />

Comments<br />

Sampling method<br />

Adequate<br />

Blinding<br />

Yes<br />

Handling of missing data<br />

Excluded from analysis<br />

Other comments<br />

Telephone interview<br />

makes rating of reference<br />

test less reliable.<br />

Rater of reference test<br />

used the structured<br />

interview guide for the<br />

HDRS (SIGH-D), however<br />

the YMRS observable<br />

item had to be<br />

excluded. It is probable<br />

that these ratings influenced<br />

ratings of CGI-BP<br />

BP = Bipolar disorder; CGI = Clinical global impressions scale; CGI-BP = Clinical global<br />

impression for Bipolar disorder; GAF = Global assessment of functioning; HDRS =<br />

Hamilton rating scale for depression; LCM = Life-chart methodology; LCM-p = Life-chart<br />

methodology prospective; n = Number of patients; NA = Not applicable; SD = Standard<br />

deviation; YMRS = Young mania rating scale<br />

426 diagnostik och uppföljning av förstämningssyndrom<br />

KAPITEL 3 • Systematisk litteraturgenomgång<br />

427

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!