03.12.2012 Views

California Legislators We the undersigned are in opposition to the ...

California Legislators We the undersigned are in opposition to the ...

California Legislators We the undersigned are in opposition to the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Name From Comments<br />

2,732. K<strong>are</strong>n Godfrey Dansville, MI Because families with special needs childfren need <strong>the</strong><br />

support. <strong>We</strong> give up so much for our kids, via f<strong>in</strong>ancial, and<br />

physical support. Also it keeps <strong>the</strong> family <strong>to</strong>ge<strong>the</strong>r and it is<br />

important for <strong>the</strong> sibl<strong>in</strong>gs as this helps with stability for <strong>the</strong><br />

family as a whole!!<br />

2,733. Karsta Jensen Santa Cruz, CA I'm friends with children who really need <strong>the</strong>se services.<br />

Please do not let <strong>the</strong>se services be elim<strong>in</strong>ated.<br />

2,734. Cheryl Albert Freedom,, CA<br />

2,735. Chelsea Fallon SAN JOSE, CA<br />

2,736. Kathleen Walsh Mill Valley, CA<br />

2,737. James Ryan Azusa, CA P<strong>are</strong>nts with disabled children have a huge f<strong>in</strong>ancial<br />

burden even with <strong>the</strong> help. <strong>California</strong> won't solve it's<br />

budget problems by tak<strong>in</strong>g away from <strong>the</strong> poorest <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

state<br />

2,738. Susan Kern San Francisco, CA How can we even consider deny<strong>in</strong>g this vulnerable<br />

population <strong>the</strong> very services <strong>the</strong>y need <strong>to</strong> achieve <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

best potential, <strong>to</strong> say noth<strong>in</strong>g of how it impacts <strong>the</strong> families<br />

and <strong>the</strong>ir communities? How about tith<strong>in</strong>g our politicians<br />

10% of <strong>the</strong>ir "take" earmarked for negative ads <strong>to</strong> support<br />

"positive" projects? Like CCS services.<br />

2,739. Allen L<strong>in</strong>g El Cerri<strong>to</strong>, CA Aga<strong>in</strong> ano<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>considerate cutback that punishes <strong>the</strong><br />

poor.<br />

2,740. John Seeley Newport Beach, CA<br />

2,741. JennieRae Paker San Jose, CA<br />

2,742. J.J. Kapp San Jose, CA<br />

2,743. Michele Dolan San Jose, CA<br />

2,744. adrian hladky Woodacre, CA<br />

2,745. Akbar Saidov SAN MATEO, CA<br />

2,746. Jaime McGrath Aliso Viejo, CA<br />

2,747. Albert Acosta <strong>We</strong>st Cov<strong>in</strong>a, CA<br />

2,748. Lily Leong San Francisco, CA<br />

2,749. gabriel fiedler Santa Rosa, CA<br />

2,750. geoff richcreek Long Beach, CA<br />

2,751. Joshua Gutier Monrovia, CA<br />

2,752. julia zellie Hunt<strong>in</strong>g<strong>to</strong>n Beach,<br />

CA<br />

2,753. Ixchel Samson San Diego, CA<br />

2,754. Er<strong>in</strong> New<strong>to</strong>n Monterey, CA<br />

2,755. Jeffrey Carvish Escondido, CA<br />

2,756. Ka<strong>the</strong>r<strong>in</strong>e Schaff San Francisco, CA<br />

Page 134 - Signatures 2,732 - 2,756

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!