28.04.2021 Views

The Battle of Britain Five Months That Changed History, May—October 1940 by James Holland (z-lib.org).epub

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

was not equipped to deal with the unexpected. When the battle deviated

from the prepared plan, the French did not know what to do. They simply

hadn’t been trained to take the initiative and to think for themselves.

Rather, military thinkers had believed that any new war would be dealt

with by first sitting tight and waiting for the enemy to attack. From their

bunkers they would halt the enemy with heavy fire, while local reserves

were brought up, bringing any enemy attack to a standstill. Only once

superiority had been achieved in men and materiel at the main point of

attack would the French then go on the offensive. Thus, French armour, for

example, was only ever conceived of as being infantry support, rather than

an independent arm.

It was a cumbersome process designed for the long-haul attritional war

of twenty years before, but while the French had pretty good tanks and

guns, and a phenomenal amount of concrete, they lacked decent, properly

thought-out logistics and disgracefully neglected developments in

communications. As a rule of thumb, orders from Gamelin’s HQ to the

front usually took around forty-eight hours. There was not even a radio at

Gamelin’s HQ, for example; he believed they were too insecure, and could

be easily listened in to by the enemy. Telephones were fine so long as the

front line was not disrupted – which it inevitably was – while messengers

were obviously horribly slow. It simply had not occurred to them that large,

modern forces could or needed to be moved quickly. The speed at which the

Germans reached the Meuse stunned them completely.

The lack of radio communication had been starkly revealed at Flavion

when the 1 Division Cuirassée had been destroyed. Hardly any French

tanks had radio sets and so they could not communicate with one another.

The Germans, on the other hand, might not have had powerful guns in their

turrets but they did have wireless sets. The Panzer Is and IIs, thanks to good

communication, were able to lure the more powerful French tanks into traps

of hidden anti-tank guns. It was these, rather than the panzers themselves,

that had done most of the damage. And there were other little things: the

French had been caught napping as they refuelled because it was such a

long-drawn-out process. Fuel bowsers would laboriously go from one tank

to another filling them up in turn. The Germans, in contrast, would deliver

truckloads of jerrycans so that panzer crews could fill up simultaneously.

And that, of course, saved time.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!