28.04.2021 Views

The Battle of Britain Five Months That Changed History, May—October 1940 by James Holland (z-lib.org).epub

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1940, the Luftwaffe had lost 3,701 aircraft irredeemably destroyed, yet it

had begun the summer with 3,578. In other words, it had losses of more

than 100 per cent. Certainly, it had had replacements, but because

production was not keeping up with losses, its combat strength by the end

of October 1940 was somewhere in the region of 75 per cent less than it had

been before the western campaign. By then, almost every Gruppe was

operating with a fraction of its supposed establishment and many of the

men were utterly exhausted, showing clear signs of combat fatigue, and

struggling to maintain morale. That would constitute defeat by most

people’s standards.

This is not really the point, however. In the summer of 1940, Germany

faced Britain and France, and had to defeat both. That was the gamble

Hitler took. He beat France, but he did not beat Britain, and at the end of the

summer Germany was significantly worse off than she had been in May,

and facing a long, attritional war on two fronts, which was precisely what

the Führer had so desperately wished to avoid. It has been fashionable in

recent years to play down the importance of the Battle of Britain, but to do

so is wrong. It was a key – if not the key – turning point in the war because

it meant that instead of the conflict being a European war which one day

would escalate into a clash between Germany and Russia, it became a

global conflict in which the Third Reich was unlikely to ever realistically

emerge victorious. Britain’s defiance did save the world from Nazism.

When Göring heard Britain had declared war on 3 September 1939, he

had telephoned von Ribbentrop. ‘Now you’ve got your ******* war!’ he

shouted down the phone. ‘You alone are to blame!’ Like so many leading

Nazis, Göring did not want war in 1939, not because he thought war was

wrong but because he knew Germany was not ready and that it would lead

to unmitigated disaster – and he had been right. He had not wanted to attack

Britain in the summer of 1940, either, recognizing that while Britain’s army

might not be up to much, she still had a powerful navy, a half-decent air

force, and in America and the Dominions both powerful and very useful

friends.

First and foremost, Germany lost the battle against Britain because she

really was not ready for war. Her economy could just about cope with a few

short, sharp conflicts such as Poland, and Norway, and as the western

campaign had proved to be, but nothing more. However over-mighty a

formation of Junkers, Dorniers and Heinkels might appear to those

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!