28.04.2021 Views

The Battle of Britain Five Months That Changed History, May—October 1940 by James Holland (z-lib.org).epub

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

agreed between the British and French Governments that you should be at

liberty to appeal to the British Government before executing that order.’ It

was an important proviso, and one that Gort would be eternally grateful for

once the German offensive began.

Nonetheless, as far as preparing for a German attack went, the French

were happy to pay lip-service to the British, but little more; indeed, the

British Government had accepted that direction of any land campaign

should be the responsibility of the French. The French war policy was much

the same as the British – that is, to wait until she had built up her strength

and then, and only then, to go on to the offensive. The great tragedy was

that in 1939 France was in fact already more than strong enough. French

forces were superior in numbers to the Germans in almost every department

at the outbreak of war, and still would be by May 1940. Sadly for the entire

history of the world, they had fallen for Nazi spin-doctoring, believing that

even Hitler would not be crazy enough to risk war if his armed forces were

not as invincible as had been made out.

In fact, the German Siegfried Line, or West Wall – the defensive system

along Germany’s western border – was underdeveloped and held by a mere

skeleton force throughout the Polish campaign. As it was, the Germans

nearly shot their bolt in Poland. Had the campaign lasted even a few days

longer, front-line units would have found themselves without any

ammunition at all. Had Gamelin mobilized his vast armies and marched

over the Rhine in September 1939, Berlin would have been theirs for the

taking and the war would indeed very likely have been over before

Christmas.

It was not to be, however. From the moment the guns fell silent in 1918,

France was determined that such a war should never happen on her soil

again. Unlike Britain, her response had been not to disarm but to build such

a strong defensive line that no attacker would ever again force its way

through.

France had fewer colonies than Britain and had been far more

traumatized than Britain by the experience of the First World War. The

attrition of the trenches had proved to the French that concrete was king. It

had also proved that the side with the stronger economy and the best

defences would ultimately prevail. This view did not alter in the 1920s and

1930s. The Maginot Line, a series of interconnected reinforced bunkers

mounted with heavy artillery and anti-tank and machine guns, and protected

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!