28.04.2021 Views

The Battle of Britain Five Months That Changed History, May—October 1940 by James Holland (z-lib.org).epub

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

and the Luftwaffe General Staff, it was Schmid, a colonel, rather than

Martini, a general, who was given the task.

His subsequent report, presented on 16 July, was riddled with

misconceptions and wrong diagnoses. Although his estimation of

operational fighter strength – 675 – was not far off the mark, he

considerably underestimated how many new aircraft were being produced a

month and claimed that British output would decrease because of damage

by German air attacks. Time would tell on that score, but during July 385

Spitfires and Hurricanes had been built and that did not include the number

that had been repaired – certainly, Schmid had not the first idea about the

Civilian Repair Organization. He reckoned that a shortage of planes rather

than pilots was the RAF’s biggest headache, when in fact the opposite was

the case. He also made no mention whatsoever of radar, or any other aspect

of Dowding’s defensive system. As far as aircraft were concerned, he

pronounced that both the Spitfire and the Hurricane were inferior to the Me

109 – that was true, although the tone suggested there was a massive gulf,

which was not the case with regard to the Spitfire. He also said that the Me

110 was superior to the Hurricane but inferior to skilfully handled Spitfires.

The Me 110 was one of Göring’s pet projects, so clearly it would not pay to

belittle it. However, while the 110 was fast and had impressive firepower, it

was nothing like as manoeuvrable as a Spitfire or Hurricane; a twin-engine

aircraft could not possibly be.

Interestingly, there is no suggestion that Schmid knew that the RAF was

split into different commands. However, perhaps his biggest misjudgement

was his verdict on Fighter Command’s structure and organization, which he

claimed was rigid and inflexible, when that was precisely what it was not.

In fact, it was ironic how much Schmid had perceived Fighter Command’s

weaknesses as strengths and its strengths as weaknesses. ‘The Luftwaffe is

clearly superior to the RAF,’ he concluded, ‘as regards strength, equipment,

training, command and location of bases.’

So the Luftwaffe, then, should have no great trouble overwhelming

Fighter Command. Neither Göring, nor Milch, nor Jeschonnek saw any

reason to doubt Beppo Schmid’s report, and it was on this appreciation and

armed with Study Blue that the plans for the all-out assault on Britain were

to be made. What was striking about both sides’ intelligence, however, was

that while Tommy Elmhirst and his team at the Air Ministry had somewhat

overestimated Luftwaffe strength, Beppo Schmid had underestimated that

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!